when push comes to shove 'our' awful aunty AusBC walks over cadavers

.. am I mad ...

  .. or is it them? ...

    .. I don't lie or kill -> it's them

Thesis/Subtitle: How long must we wait until sanity - and decency - is restored?

-=*=-

Nigger, d**k hanging in glass of curdled milk.

Passer-by: Hey, man - what you do'n?

Nigger: Ah'm f**k'n dis custard.

Trigger article 1:

Rebel celebrations wreak havoc on Qaddafi's compound
Updated August 24, 2011 10:09:00
Rebel fighters drive through Tripoli
(Anne Barker)
  «Their forces rushed in, cheering and firing their guns in the air.
With scenes similar to the fall of Baghdad, the Libyan forces set about destroying a statue of Muammar Gaddafi.» 
[AusBC/Barker]

Comment: Read it yourself. The propaganda was that G was attacking his own people (snipers, containers of Viagra), my bet is that it was much more the other way; pig-higorants shooting their gifted weapons at anything, nothing, and d*g help you if you were anywhere at all in range. We saw the pictures (US-style pick-ups, humungous weapons welded-on (careful in the round-abouts)), and speaking of which, by whom and how were the TV videos made, of berserkers imitating US-grunts, kicking doors in, guns at the obvious ready? Or down putative 'spider holes,' braving mines and/or ambush? A: True heroes, or Hollywood crews out on a (faked) lark?

Trigger article 2:

Rebels find Gaddafi's 'creepy' Condoleezza scrapbook
Updated August 26, 2011 23:12:02
  «Among the pictures in the album are a series of photos of Dr Rice and Colonel Gaddafi during their 2008 diplomatic talks in Tripoli.» 
[AusBC/'news']

Comment: Read it yourself. Not only Rice, but Blair et al., any number of snivelling quisling sycophantic hangers-on. Were they insincere then, now, or both?

-=*=-

Barker is an AusBC propagandist, see my previous post here. Every time she's 'allowed' an article on Iran, she inevitably includes something like: 'The west suspects Iran of wanting an A-bomb.' (This, despite the consensus of all 17(?) US 'intel' agencies: "Not!") She 'jumped' from the ME to London (riots; AusBC support for Cameron) sometime between Aug 3 and 10, now between Aug 19 and 23 to Libya. The 'girl' gets around - possibly because she has no ties-that-bind. If you saw a picture, you might understand her apparent preference for radio.

-=*=-

Back to Libya:

True, Gaddafi may not be dead yet; no so-called (Hollywood-cast) 'spider-hole,' no kangaroo court, no lynching filmed on mobile-'phone - yet. But with the NATO-sponsored rebel-rabble 'leadership' posting a $1.x mio 'dead or alive' reward, it won't be long. So much for civilisation, and US-NATO-F+UK 'ethical' support.

Worse than troglodytes; Libya had good education, lots of social programs, medical etc.. But they were thoroughly propagandised: 'You wanna be free!' (Don't we all, of lies & rip-offs.) Not just 'wanna,' they were helped - by 5mths aerial bombardment, then at the end, a NATO ship, brings the duds to Tripoli, while NATO helicopter gun-ships clear the way in front of them. Real 'men.' (Psst guys! Look for the containers filled with 'blueies!')

More like vicious ingrates. (For those with neither education nor dictionary: ingratitude  n. lack of due gratitude.[POD])

AusBC + Anne Barker = propaganda

.. we just ...

  .. do not do ...

    .. coincidences

Preamble 1; from my uk riots: A proper "of, by, for the people etc." democracy requires at least these three; 1) an informed & engaged electorate, 2) full & free info-flows, and 3) a wide range of honest candidates who, if/when elected, represent the electorate by implementing the will of the majority, protecting any minorities. Our, i.e. US, UK, Aus and other such 'pretend democracy' rogue-regimes, fail all three. Deliberately dumbed-down citizens, distracted by trivia & disinformation on TV, a corrupt & venal MSM (did anyone mention Murdoch?), and most representatives sell-out to the highest bidder, usually corporations but worst-case, the "Israel Lobby."

Preamble 2: Back in the early 70s, I had a 'debate' with a friend on the ME problem, whereby I took a pro-Z approach. I was wrong, as wrong as wrong could be. *Why* I was wrong, was because I had based my arguments on what I had learned from 'reports' in the media, almost exclusively from the AusBC. Since I was wrong, so the info I had been 'fed' was wrong; this forms my prima facie case against the AusBC. Nothing of significance has changed much in the meantime - and further, that both the AusBC and the various Aus governments follow a pro-Z 'line' forms a prima facie case showing collusion, and since the Zs are criminal, this pro-Z collusion forms a conspiracy - primarily against truth & justice for the hapless Palestinians, but also against us, we the sheople, since by and large we are not criminal and do not wish to support or even associate with criminals.

-=*=-

Now, to Anne Barker. She had a 'wonderful' start to her stint as ME-correspondent; she was observing a demo by extremist Z-settlers (aka illegal occupiers) - and was spat upon by same extremist Z-settlers. But she persevered, regularly reporting from the ME - including, wherever possible, propagandist digs with a pro-Z slant and/or a pro-US regime slant - note that any slant = bias, and since the Z and US regimes are rogue, Barker's slant is, as the AusBC's itself in general, against we the sheople's interests. The easiest way to prove this is to Google for: iran nuclear weapon "the west" "Anne Barker" site:abc.net.au - which just returned "About 105 results (0.20 secs)". Q: Why is this propagandistic? A: Because it is the agreed verdict of the entire US-intelligence community, that Iran does *not* have a nuclear weapons program. Certain parties, namely the rogue Z-regime and the US-neoCons plus hangers-on & apologists wish to attack Iran; Barker's propaganda aligns with such wishes, quote; "The moves coincide with Iranian warnings against any attack. Its arch-foes, the United States and Israel, have not ruled out taking military action over Tehran's controversial nuclear program." Note the language; 'arch-foes,' 'military action.' Note the allegation; "controversial nuclear program" - which, whatever it is, is known *not* to be for weapons, see US-intel. Iran is under continual aggressive attack by rogue-regimes; has been since at least 1953 when the vile US/UK meddlers deposed the democratically elected Mossadegh. Not so BTW; Iran has oil, as does Iraq & Libya - as if you didn't know.

Another; "ANNE BARKER: ... But 20 per cent enriched uranium is enough to produce a weapon if there's a big enough quantity ..." 

Me: What rubbish; criminal, inflammatory & *wrong* propagandist-rubbish. Yet this is what is passed off by the AusBC as 'responsible reporting.'

Now Anne Barker the ME-propagandist has a new assignment, see [1].

Clarification: I am a seeker after truth & justice; I present 'facts as I see them' (i.e. as reported), along with analysis/opinion based on my observations, i.e. all care but no responsibility; kindly do not shoot this messenger.

One report I saw, initially regarded with a bit of suspicion, alleged that these riots came at a 'good' time for an under-pressure Cameron, creating public outrage and thus allowing him to go 'tough on crime,' always good for politicians. The article further alleged that the police deliberately hung back, allowing the riots and looting to develop. I must admit that the scale as seen on TV was impressive, with entire blocks burning (how did they achieve that?); described as 'worst since the Blitz.' Perhaps the article was not too far off the mark after all; you could try looking here with follow-up article here.

Summary: Several coincidences, each getting less 'believable' (believing is what some people do in the absence of evidence); that the riots could take place at all, that they could be so impressive, that that suits both Cameron's & the militarised police's interests - *plus* the arrival on the scene of an AusBC propagandist. Make you go hmmm?

-=*end*=-

PS Moral 1: IF anyone violates the 'democratic covenant' - by telling us lies, say, since a mal-informed electorate may not make properly informed decisions, THEN they make themselves 'democratic criminals' - and thus we the people's enemies.

PPS Moral 2: Cameron&Co are (rightly) outraged by a few looters, armed with little more than sticks & BiCs. Q: What of the poor Libyan people, being attacked by NATO; more specifically, mainly F + UK, using the most modern aerial weapons, after the US cruise-missiles reduced Libya's air-defences to smouldering rubble? A: We can see who the really serious criminals are.

-=*=-

[1] List of recent Barker articles at time of writing - basically, just for the where/when:

{

UK defence lawyer says harsh riot sentences not the norm

ABC Online - 8 minutes ago

ANNE BARKER: I hear what you're saying that most of these are perhaps not representative but where we are seeing it; how can you justify such harsher sentences ...

UK police and courts under fire for handling of riots

ABC Online - 3 hours ago

ANNE BARKER: In the days since the mob violence spiralled out of control, British police, almost as much as the rioters, have come in for a pasting. ...

UK defence lawyer says harsh riot sentences not the norm

ABC Online - 3 hours ago

ANNE BARKER: I hear what you're saying that most of these are perhaps not representative but where we are seeing it; ...

British rioters face court

ABC Online - 19 hours ago

Our correspondent, Anne Barker, joins me now from London. They're running night courts aren't they? ...

British PM flags tough measures to fight street crime

ABC Online - Aug 11, 2011

ANNE BARKER: One of the most harrowing scenes from this week's riots captured on video was the attack on a young Malaysian student in London ...

UK PM flags tough response to rioting

ABC Online - Aug 10, 2011

ANNE BARKER: As British police struggle with the wave of looting and destruction authorities are confronting a broader question; ...

Mubarak trial begins

ABC Online - Aug 3, 2011

Our Middle-East correspondent Anne Barker is covering the trial and joins me now. ...

Mubarak trial imminent

ABC Online - Aug 2, 2011

ANNE BARKER: The security presence on Cairo's streets is visibly tight. The courtroom has been readied for one of the biggest cases in Egyptian history. ...

World condemns Syrian violence

ABC Online - Anne Barker - Aug 1, 2011

ANNE BARKER, REPORTER: The streets of Hama have turned into a war zone since Syrian troops stepped up their military crackdown on anti-Government demonstrations. ...

Deadly crackdown on Syrian protestors

ABC Online - Jul 31, 2011

ANNE BARKER: The city of Hama has been under siege for weeks since residents there turned out for some of the biggest protests seen in Syria since the uprising began in March ...

Islamist groups dominate protests in Cairo

ABC Online - Jul 29, 2011

ANNE BARKER: For months Egyptians from all religious and ethnic groups have been united in their campaign for democracy and change. ...

Mubarak trial in doubt

ABC Online - Jul 27, 2011

ANNE BARKER: For weeks now Egyptian protesters have been back on the streets in Cairo and other cities, ramping up their demands for faster reform. ...

Israelis press government on home truths

ABC Online - Jul 26, 2011

ANNE BARKER: This is Rothschild Boulevard, the poshest street in Tel Aviv which is one of the most affluent cities in the Middle East. ...

Egyptians protest at slow pace of reform

ABC Online - Jul 19, 2011

Middle East correspondent Anne Barker has just returned from Cairo and filed this report ...

}

trick & (re)treat can the jokester Obama push the Zs back behind pre'67 borders?

.. after 63+ bloody years ...

  .. ethnically cleansing Palestine ...

    .. giving up even 1cm² would give Zs seizures

Putative subtitle: White man speak with forked-tongue.

This subtitle could be considered prima facie racist, but given a) that the US was built on land ethnically cleansed of its pre-European invasion natives, b) Israel is built on land ethnically cleansed of its pre-Zionist invasion natives and c) the Zionists' recognition-demand bleatings themselves include an undeniably racist term[1], it's not me who suffers from "deep-rooted racism."

-=*=-

Trigger article:

Obama delivers Middle East peace vision
By Jane Cowan and Anne Barker
Updated May 20, 2011 09:53:00
  «Barack Obama presented his most detailed vision yet on the path to Israeli-Palestinian peace.» 
[AusBC/justin]

Comment: 63+ bloody, and bloody-well unsuccessful years of 'peace-process' stories, via and *assisted* by the AusBC, and *NO* visible change except Zionist outwards border 'creep' should tell us of a) the competency of the 'players' and/or b) the not-so hidden agendas they have 'in play.'

The Z-demands are always the same, and note the language: "demands," as opposed to the normal negotiation process of exchanging offers to compromise?

Z-apologist-demand #1: The right to exist.

Q #1: Why? UNGA181 offered a 'Jewish homeland' in a partition of Palestine; it did *not* envisage any diminution of the “civil and religious rights of [the] existing non-Jewish” Arab majority there, nor did it sanction any use of force. Once Plan Dalet & Deir Yassin-type massacres showed the Zionists' true colours, the 'Zionist project' should have been terminated (by the UN) to prevent the murdering ethnic cleansing which took place and still continues. Deir Yassin-type massacres are clearly illegal (as well as utterly immoral), and *cancel* any claimed 'right to exist,' as criminal acts extirpate all rights (except to a fair trial). Lacking legitimacy, all subsequent Zionist claims must fail.

Z-apologist-demand #2: The right to claim land won in a 'civil war.'

Q #2: Why? a) In the 1st place, the Zionists were overwhelmingly newly arrived immigrants. When new arrivals attack local natives, that's referred to as an 'alien invasion' = aggressive = Nuremberg. In the 2nd place, UNSCR242 refers to the "inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war."  b) Land(property) may only be acquired by free&fair exchange; all improperly alienated land(property) should revest.

Z-apologist-demand #3: The right to unilaterally declare independence.

Q #3: Why? a) Following #1 = illegitimacy, nothing remains except to be brought to justice. b) May a burglar/home-invader declare their independence from justice? Absurd. Yet not merely 'tolerated' but supported by the US + sycophant-quisling regimes. It's called condoning crime.

Z-apologist-demand #4: The right to defend.

Q #4: Why? See #3, depending on #1 = illegitimacy = all rights extirpated. The correct response to a burglary/home-invasion is not to arm the criminals, but to send in the SWAT teams, to arrest and bring to trial. (Compare Abbottobad perversion of justice.)

Terminology: Alien invader-murderers for spoil = AIMs4S; this clearly fits the Zionist project perpetrators in Palestine. The hapless victims are erstwhile legal owner/occupiers = ELO/Os. Given the Deir Yassin-type massacres, more or less continuously down to the most recent outrage = shooting many unarmed Nakba-demonstrators dead, Q: what right did they ever have to renaming the ethnically-cleansed part of Palestine to Israel? A: IMHO none, no rights at all.

Comment: The Zionist project = Israel is clearly illegitimate. In UNGA273, Israel promised to honour UNGA181 (respect ELO/Os' rights) & UNGA194 (ELO/Os' right of return). That the Zionist AIMs4S violate their own promises is unremarkable, since lying is a minor sin compared to murdering theft.

Comment: That Obama may change the Zionists' modus operandi, let alone criminal course, is on the face of it risible = fails the 'giggle-test;' rage and threats from Israeli extremists are the 1st visible responses.

Fazit: There can be no peace without justice = finally respect ELO/Os' rights, and their right of return, their improperly alienated property to revest and/or a fair recompense and reparations. The US & UN both could earn some credibility; the Zs could begin a retreat from complete pariah-status. The Zs could start with a sincere "Sorry!"

[1]

and when they were bad, they were horrid [US&Z *rogue* regimes - propaganda, black- & psy-ops = lies]

.. the 'winning' ...

  .. doesn't really end ...

    .. until the gloating is done

Subtitle, 1: Out of the mouths of babes - err, crooks.

Subtitle, 2; Q: Who's to blame?

Thesis: Those who murder for spoil have zero qualms about lying; proof = no-one (in their right-mind) admits to crime, so lie the guilty ones must. Lying is per definition done to deceive, and when deceived by politicians, voters may not make properly informed voting decisions at least in the lying context, and not at all if the credibility of the candidate is deemed vital (what else? Vote for a liar?) Thanks, but "No, thanks!" to JWHoward, we in Aus had the super-cynical mantra "All politicians lie!" imposed upon us - the 'all' may tend to hyperbole, but the particular was repeatedly demonstrated (i.e. the baseless 'Saddam uses people-shredders!' allegation = 'misleading the house' - and with it, the country) - why is it so? No worthwhile project ever requires propaganda-camouflage, yet we are continually being assaulted by lies. The lies are organised around 'narratives,' to keep them on-song and (often imperfectly) non-contradictory, like the lame fog-of-war 'extenuations' recently deployed; the 'lie-cloud' forms the pushed-propaganda paradigm = the perpetrators' own created perversion of reality.

The 'standard' crimes are cheating, theft and murder; lies are both the gateway and a give-away to criminal depredations.

-=*=-

Trigger article:

 - TOP NEWS -
Israeli Troops Fire as Marchers Breach Borders
  «Israel's borders erupted into deadly clashes as thousands of Palestinians marched from Syria, Lebanon, Gaza and the West Bank.» 
[nytimes/eml]

Note the nytimes' language; "Breach," say. It is a 'biased' term[1] with ideological/aggressive 'baggage,' also with its alternates[2], a more neutral and simpler 'crossed' would work better = be more accurate. But propaganda uses such 'coloured' terms for the desired (usually as here -ve) effects, although the opposite = +ve also occurs; i.e. "Land of the free, home of the brave." Oh, yeah: Free as in free to be denied medical treatment without a credit card, and/or to have their jobs shipped o/s, brave as in shooting unarmed civilians - not 'just' ObL, but the 100s of 1000s if not millions who have been killed/slaughtered as hapless 'collaterals' resulting from US wars for spoil. Here, the hyped +ves are actually -ves; more lies.

Comment 1: The headline is enough at the moment. 'Normal' people, even if traumatised by 63+ bloody years of murderingly violent dispossession and oppression, are nevertheless assumed to be non-idiotic; any demonstrator carrying anything that even remotely looked like a weapon would be seeking their martyr-hood in a hurry. Ergo, we can assume that the 'invading' Palestinians were unarmed, and were carrying out a peaceful demonstration; perhaps calling out "Return *our* land to us ELO/Os, the erstwhile legal owner/occupiers! - Observe UNGA181 & UNGA194, like you *promised* to, in UNGA273!" Also possibly "All AIMs4S (and descendants) to return to whence they came!"

Comment 2: Some say that Israel sits on stolen land; can we confirm/deny? Generally, land&property are alienable (adj. Law able to be transferred to new ownership [POD]), the 'normal' way is by *voluntary* exchange; $s for soil, say. UNSCR242 includes the "inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war." Under the principle of "A fair exchange is no robbery," Q: Why are the Palestinians still trying to get their improperly alienated land/property back = revested (reinstate, restore, return)? More: "Revesting and restitution of property on conviction." (Aye, there's the rub: Actually achieving justice.) IMHO, 'confirmed.'

Comment 3: No burglar or violent home-invader may declare him/herself independent of justice; no alien invaders may ethnically cleanse via genocidal attacks - and remain 'legal' - let alone moral. Latest with the vile Deir Yassin massacre and such-like terrorist attacks (similar continuing down to today - or if not exactly today, then some immediate yesterday and tomorrow), the UN should have halted the crime that is the Zionist project (the UN did attempt a recovery with UNGA194, sadly failed = lack of application); *unless* the UN gets serious and stops wars & injustices, THEN it is what it appears to be, namely a total sham and worse, actually in the service of - *rogue* regimes, see the current neo-colonialist, UNSC-sanctioned attacks on Libya. As I wrote on 20Mar'11 in Shockin' Whore Mk2, it's Iraq (murder for oil) all over again, this time in slow-motion (AusBC: "Britain wants NATO to ramp up attacks against Moamar Gaddafi's regime in Libya by attacking electricity grids, roads and even oil supplies.") Me: Gives new meaning to 'revolting.' These *aggressive attackers* are out of all control. Why? Who lets 'em? Not me, matey.

-=*=-

Propaganda is old; a mini-review:

This story may begin with a deployed lie: "Making the world safe for democracy!" This was a 'mantra' used by Wilson during WW1 to 'convince' the US public that joining the war against "the Boche" was a good idea. Water well under the bridge, but the real questions are two: Why did Wilson have to 'sell' the war anyway, with the 2nd, more sinister Q: Why did Wilson himself want war? A: Same-old same-old, see the modern, wicked M/I/C/4-plex; this tiny minority gets *richer*, while lots of the cannon-fodder gets *killed*, not to mention the squillion *innocent* collaterals. The significant thing is that Wilson's "Making the world safe ..." was a trick then, as it still is a trick today; proof = it's still being deployed. But it's not 'merely' a trick; it's also a lie, easily proven: A tricked = deceived electorate cannot vote 'straight' (hence the derived jibe: JWHoward ‘couldn't lie straight in bed.’)

Bernays was fascinated by the Wilson mantra, and even more so because of its effects. He was sooo fascinated that he turned it into a career, morphing 'propaganda' into PR = public relations, because of the extremely negative connotations of propaganda; usually rotten lies. Bernays was successful; perhaps his most infamous stunt was convincing women that they could smoke tobacco & get away with it. Note that a lot of "convince ... get away with" is still going on.

To illustrate some negativity here, consider this:

  «In his 1928 book, "Propaganda," he wrote:
"The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country."» 
[frugalmarketing/John Forde]

Comment: As for an electorate deceived, so for one 'manipulated.' Bernays based his thinking on some of Freud's work, he of the 'un- and sub-conscious.' The theory went that the 'free' masses, with their unconscious drives would (somehow??!) run amok, so the masses could not be allowed to be free, and that meant crippling 'democracies' by the aforesaid manipulations via deceptions = propaganda = lies. A neater, more self-serving policy could hardly be imagined, proof = this one is still 'running,' and how.

Next bit:

  «First is simply that this kind of deeper selling to the subconscious can be used in all kinds of ways, not all of them good.
Joseph Goebbels, for instance, would later use another Bernays book, "Crystallizing Public Opinion," to sway desperate Germans toward Hitler's murderous agenda.» 
[frugalmarketing/John Forde, ibid.]

Which leads directly to "The Big Lie."

[Pause, for reflection...]

Q: OK, how big?

A: Humongous!

-=*=-

A "Big Lie" doesn't even have to be prima facie 'believable' - just as long as it has enough 'shock value' to 'flip' the listeners into an *emotional*, outraged state. It's the essence of Freud's 'un- and sub-conscious' but in reverse; recalling that 'belief' is done in the absence of *evidence*, here 'belief' is invoked (via lies) in the absence of *intelligence*, any available intelligence having been *switched-off* (another 'novel' = newly deployed propaganda-construct) - by the emotional shock. Example: Dumping babies out of incubators to steal such incubators away, abandoning the babies to death on a cold, stone floor. The story was 'presented' (= conduited, assisted) by the MSM as 'news' = truth - but was later proven false, demonstrating the 4th Estate's corrupt & venal modus operandi. Example: Saddam's totally non-existent WMDs. Example: Libyan snipers, firing on innocents from roof-tops. Example: Women (wives!) as 'human shields.' Example: IMF chief rapes hotel-maid. Q: Are they mad? A: Yes; those who murder for spoil have zero qualms about lying. And they can do all of these viciously criminal things because they are psychopaths, possibly resulting from faulty socialisation, *OR*: Are they deliberately, malevolently 'produced' by deliberate 'manipulation' of their 'un- and sub-conscious' *immature* minds? Whatever; vile monsters is what they are.

And apart from their murders for spoil (Zs = soil, US = oil), they are killing our once jewel-like planet's ecosphere, by revving-up CO2 production, instead of going sustainable.

I realised the other day that I keep asking questions like "Why," precisely because we're all being kept mostly in the dark - by being told outright lies, as well as having critical info withheld. Q: Why? A: Beats me (rich getting richer in the face of utter catastrophe tends to 'flip' me into an *emotional*, outraged state) - and that ain't too flash, I'll tell ya - 'for free.'

-=*end*=-

PS; Q: Who's to blame?

A: All the liars.

The M/I/C/4-plex = Military, Industrial, Congress (US for 'parliament'), the 4th Estate = corrupt & venal MSM + AusBC et al..

The I/J/Z-plex should be self-explanatory; criminal key is Zionism.

The AIMs4S = alien/aggressor invading-murderers for spoil.

The schools producing the psychologists = PR-types.

The schools producing the economists = banksters.

The sheople for their damnable 'incuriosity.'

But not me; I see the evil, and blog it.

It's the best I can do - and you?

-=*=-

Ref(s):

[1] breach  -n. 1 (often foll. by of) breaking or non-observation of a law, contract, etc. 2 breaking of relations; quarrel. 3 opening, gap. -v. 1 break through; make a gap in. 2 break (a law, contract, etc.).  step into the breach help in a crisis, esp. as a replacement. [Germanic: related to *break] [POD]

[2] breach verb
1 the river breached its bank
BREAK (THROUGH), burst (through), rupture, force itself through, split; informal bust.
2 the proposed changes breached trade union rules
BREAK, contravene, violate, fail to comply with, infringe, transgress against; defy, disobey, flout, fly in the face of; law infract. [New Oxford Thesaurus] 

kill unarmed 'ObL' = black-op = psyop

.. they killed someone ...

  .. dumped the body ...

    .. or, so they say

Thesis: IF they tell lies THEN their credibility crashes-and-burns.

-=*=-

Trigger article:

Porn stash found in bin Laden hideout
Posted May 14, 2011 07:33:00 | Updated May 14, 2011 07:32:00
  «A stash of pornography was found in the Pakistan hideout of Osama bin Laden by the commandos who killed him, United States officials said.» 
[AusBC/justin]

Comment 1: Note the language; "stash," "hideout."

Comment 2: Refer "The Big Lie."

Comment 3: They also said "human shield," later admitted to be - err, an 'error' = outright lie.

Q: What's next?

Possible A: ObL murdered children to use their blood in certain aspects of his dialysis: "Saddam sent me the best from Kuwaiti incubators," the unarmed ObL was saying, as the US Navy SEAL extra-judicial kill-team = death-squad burst into his bedroom, their .45 magnum assault-MGs splashing hot-lead around everywhere; legs, heads - who cares?
You may do your own search ...

The Demon Zionists (continued)

By Ernest William Graham (continued from "The Demon Zionists")


G'day ID, this is a copy of what I sent to "Yourdemocracy".

G'day Gus,
Isn't the "Nazi Salute" merely a copy of the Roman Emperor’s? And the Nazi banners and marches a copy the Americans with troops the width of the roadway they use? A show of power?

What I am trying to say here Gus is that the demands by the Zionists with respect to the removal of freedom of expression, merely because it offends them personally, actually supports the theory that they consider themselves the "untouchables"?

I originally came into this debate about occupied Palestine - because of the way the Zionists had cast aside the principles of the U.N. Charter and common decency for a time now exceeding 60 years. They have acted consistently with lies, deceit, guile and contempt for right and wrong.

It actually beggars belief that these centuries’ old procedures of claiming that anything that is not conducive to their independent military plans (while they interfere with others) self pity (while they deny even a modicum of that to their chosen enemies) and Nazi/Apartheid policies (which they are repeating even as we write) - should be punished.

All decent human beings will be increasing their sympathies to the victims of the Zionists – as it should be. A contemporary world, misguided by the U.S. principles of “blame your enemy for doing what you are really doing yourself” is hopefully being exposed by people having access to sites such as this.

And I steal John Richardson's quote of Emile Zola ...
If we shut up truth & bury it under the ground, it will but grow, & gather to itself such explosive power that the day it bursts through, it will blow up everything in its way.

That reminds one of the recorded speeches of such peaceful people as Ben Gurion, Golda Meir and that humanitarian Lieberman.

Netanyahu and his cohorts should consider that their rape and murder of the Palestinians may forever be remembered in the pages of non-Jewish history, even to a point which may expose the shameful part of it that they so deceitfully claim as only their “Holocaust” – not a Holocaust against humanity itself – just them! Fair dinkum.

Any deceit citizen of this world of ours must have an opinion of what is right or wrong?

Cheers mate. God bless Australia. NE OUBLIE.
 

the AusBC & denying the Holocaust (US, Z-rael vs. Iran)

.. this is *far* too serious ...

  .. for playing games with it ...

    .. yet the AusBC serially offends

-=*=-

[PPS added]

-=*=-

Preamble: A properly functioning democracy vitally depends, amongst other things, on complete and honest reporting of facts, free speech involving the exchange of validly-based opinions and the identification of lies and other distortions; censorship[0] in this context does *not* belong. Forbidding discussion of denial[1] of the Holocaust[2] or 9/11 'conspiracy' and/or 'false flag' theories, say, is not 'just' antidemocratic, but that in the extreme. Yet such forbidding occurs in some (dark, repressive) corners, as does the terming of *validly based* criticism of Z-rael 'anti-Semitic[3].' The latter is doubly erroneous; the word Semite[4] describes both Jews and Arabs - and as being related to each other, to boot. (When a Jew kills an Arab, he is (metaphorically) killing 'a brother' - nothing new there; move on!)

In particular, pushing lying propaganda and/or censoring vital truths cannot help but harm any entity based on justice via truth - as we assume that our democracies bloody-well ought to be.

-=*=-

Consider snips from the following three reports:

1. US blasts Ahmadinejad's Holocaust dismissal
By Washington correspondent Kim Landers
Posted September 19, 2009 05:00:00
  «At a Tehran University at the end of an annual anti-Israel "Qods [Jerusalem] Day" rally, the Iranian leader said: "The pretext [Holocaust] for the creation of the Zionist regime [Israel] is false... It is a lie based on an unprovable and mythical claim."
"Confronting the Zionist regime is a national and religious duty."
...
"We condemn what he said and I would point to what the President said in Cairo - denying the holocaust will isolate Iran further from the world," Mr Gibbs said.» 
[AusBC/justin]

2. GMT: 9/18/2009 10:50:44 AM
President: Holocaust black box should be opened
Tehran, Sept 18, IRNA
  «He added, "The pretext for establishing the Zionist regime is a lie; a lie which relies on an unreliable claim, a mythical claim, and the occupation of Palestine has nothing to do with the Holocaust."» 
[irna.ir]

Note: The quotes *do not match*, why not? A search for "It is a lie based on an unprovable and mythical claim" site:.ir finds no hits, but a search for "a lie which relies on an unreliable claim" site:.ir gets 4. Who would have the 'better,' more authoritative translation? But that's a 'small' worry; see more below.

3. Ahmadinejad wants global front against Israel
Fri, 18 Sep 2009 09:46:45 GMT
  «"The Zionist regime is the symbol of lies and deception," which was founded on 'colonialist' attitudes, President Ahmadinejad added.
...
The president then went on to question the story behind the Holocaust and urged a probe into it.
"If the Holocaust, as you claim, is true, why don't you allow a probe into the issue?"» 
[presstv.ir]

Note: Saying "IF (some question) THEN (some conclusion)" is *not* denial. Ahmadinejad (validly!) queries why some queries are not permitted, i.e. queries why genuine queries should be censored.

Discussion: As usual, one should read *all* of the cited articles. Then, the most pressing question, the most damning allegation, is of "Holocaust denial." That's what it's all about, does he or doesn't he? Attempting an answer is *not* helped by poor and/or un-attributed quotes; where/how does the Anglo/Judaic press, *known to be (criminally!) biased* get their inputs?

Finally (here), does the AusBC quote (if true) prove denial? IMHO, not. "The pretext," Oh, so cynically deployed by Zs certainly includes the Holocaust, but note that "The pretext" in (1) has "[Holocaust]" inserted (erroneously implying that the Holocaust itself is a lie); Ahmadinejad's statement quoted in (2) above equates "The pretext" directly with "lie." The two statements are *quite* different. Comment: Yes, the Holocaust was bad. No, the Holocaust was never reason to dispossess the pre-'47/8 legitimate owner/occupiers of Palestine - the UN itself acted immorally, if not illegally. IMHO, that is exactly Ahmadinejad's point. Then, having got a foot in the '47/8 door, the Zs proceeded to illegally dispossess ever more hapless Palestinians; genocide, ethnic cleansing, apartheid, etc. are all present now, as they have been for all of the 61+ bloody years since '47/8 = Z-murder for land-theft. *All* Israelis, *all* non-effectively protesting Jews everywhere - also in the so-called Diaspora[5] carry both the responsibility and the blame for these vicious Z-crimes (*not* to protest, and that *effectively*, is to extend (tacit) support) - and *all* will 'wear' the ignominy for as long as the crimes continue - and of course, without *complete* 'reconciliation' well beyond = possibly forever damned.

Ahmadinejad may be being deliberately provocative - but if he wished to deny the Holocaust, Q: Why doesn't he deny it boldly, baldly, directly? He is certainly otherwise outspoken... A: IMHO, because he *doesn't* deny it; he plays with the Z's (criminal!) perfidy.

-=*=-

It took me not much more than 15mins, from reading the 1st to finding the 2nd two. I'm an amateur seeker of truth; the AusBC are (supposedly) professionals. Yet their report seems to ignore and/or distort - or at least, takes no notice of - the info available in the 2nd two reports - why?

The previous sentence may be being too kind. I charge the AusBC with pushing deliberate distortions (aka lying) in the name of propagandising us, we the sheople - the ultimate source of the AusBC's dough. In a 'normal,' i.e. honest business, any and all employees discovered lying would instantly be sacked.

-=*end*=-

PS The AusBC language is both bizarre and inflammatory: "blasts" would be far better written "criticised." The AusBC does idiotic things like this all the time- boo! Hiss! Traitorous, anti-democratic bastards.

PPS Recall that this semantic 'storm in a teacup' - but containing the most ugly allegations - is not driven by Ahmadinejad, although he is being just that little bit naughty. Nooo, it (the semantic 'perfect' storm - of filthy lies, immoral propaganda, illegal threats "All options!" etc. - all aimed at vilifying Iran) is being driven by the so-called 'world leader,' revved-up by its illegitimate sprog, and the not so 'secret agenda' is ultimately to attack Iran and steal its 'patrimony' too, as the already well under way illegal, immoral invasion/brutal occupation of Iraq has shown. All this, while the US & Z-rael can't/won't *buy* what they want, Oh no; rather than buy, they set out to steal via murdering force. How utterly charming!

Their obvious motto: "Have guns; will & do murder to steal."

-=*=-

Ref(s):

[0] censor —n. official authorized to suppress or expurgate books, films, news, etc., on grounds of obscenity, threat to security, etc. —v. 1 act as a censor of. 2 make deletions or changes in.  censorial adj. censorship n. [Latin censeo assess]

Usage As a verb, censor is often confused with censure. [POD]

[1] denial n. 1 denying the truth or existence of a thing. 2 refusal of a request or wish. 3 disavowal of a leader etc. [ibid.]

deny v. (-ies, -ied) 1 declare untrue or non-existent. 2 repudiate or disclaim. 3 (often foll. by to) withhold (a thing) from (denied him the satisfaction; denied it to me).  deny oneself be abstinent. [Latin: related to *negate] [ibid.]

[2] holocaust n. 1 large-scale destruction, esp. by fire or nuclear war. 2 (the Holocaust) mass murder of the Jews by the Nazis 1939–45. [Greek holos whole, kaustos burnt] [ibid.]

[3] anti-Semite n. person who is prejudiced against Jews.  anti-Semitic adj. anti-Semitism n. [ibid.]

[4] Semite n. member of the peoples said to be descended from Shem (Gen. 10), including esp. the Jews and Arabs. [Greek Sem Shem] [ibid.]

[5] Diaspora n. 1 the dispersion of the Jews after their exile in 538 BC. 2 the dispersed Jews. [Greek] [ibid.]