webdiary_not-so-libre

dancing over murdered bodies to rip the F-ing oil profits off why can't they just buy oil?

2011-10-21T14:44:00.009+02:00

.. 3 versions at least ...

.. each different = some lies ...

.. since only one version can be true

Subtitle: Gaddafi died in custody (= murdered); that OK with you?

[update, 22Oct'11]

-=*=-

Post-mortem; Q: What evidence do I have?

A: What I have gathered from/via the AusBC = publicly funded broadcaster.

From the "News Just In" section of a page in "The Drum:"

Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 13:42:49 +0200 (CEST)
Anti-Gaddafi forces claim capture of Sirte
<http://www.abc.net.au/news/2011-10-20/libya-forces-capture-sirte/3581908?section=justin>

Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 19:43:10 +0200 (CEST)
Gaddafi killed as home town captured
<http://www.abc.net.au/news/2011-10-20/libya-forces-capture-sirte/3581908?section=justin>

-=*=-

From the "Just In" page itself, and some from the articles:

[v1:]
NTC official claims Gaddafi dead
Posted October 20, 2011 21:29:14 | Updated October 20, 2011 23:33:20

There are unconfirmed reports deposed Libyan leader Moamar Gaddafi has died of wounds suffered during his capture near his home town of Sirte.
...
"He has been captured. He is badly wounded, but he is still breathing," Mohamed Leith told AFP, adding that he had seen Gaddafi himself and that he was wearing a khaki uniform and a turban.
...
Mr Majid said Gaddafi was caught trying to flee Sirte in a convoy which NATO warplanes attacked.

Other reports said he was found hiding in a hole shouting "don't shoot, don't shoot".

Topics: unrest-conflict-and-war, world-politics, libyan-arab-jamahiriya
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2011-10-20/libya-forces-capture-sirte/3581908

-=*=-

[v2:]
Gaddafi dead, Sirte captured
Posted October 20, 2011 21:29:14 | Updated October 21, 2011 03:40:24

Deposed Libyan leader Moamar Gaddafi has died of wounds sustained when fighters captured his home town of Sirte, interim prime minister Mahmoud Jibril has confirmed.

"We have been waiting for this moment for a long time," Mr Jibril told a news conference in the capital Tripoli.

"Moamar Gaddafi has been killed."

His death, which came swiftly after his capture is the most dramatic single development in the Arab Spring revolts that have unseated rulers in Egypt and Tunisia and threatened the grip on power of the leaders of Syria and Yemen.

Details about exactly how and where Gaddafi was found are mixed and there are also conflicting reports as to whether Gaddafi's son, Mutassim, has been captured alive or was killed.

Topics: unrest-conflict-and-war, world-politics, libyan-arab-jamahiriya
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2011-10-20/libya-forces-capture-sirte/3581908

-=*=-

[v3:]
Gaddafi 'killed in crossfire' after capture
Middle East correspondent Anne Barker, staff
Posted October 20, 2011 21:29:14 | Updated October 21, 2011 11:11:01

...
Libya's new leaders say Gaddafi died from a bullet wound to the head after being dragged from his hiding place in a sewage pipe during the final hours of the struggle for control of the city.

Topics: unrest-conflict-and-war, world-politics, libyan-arab-jamahiriya
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2011-10-20/libya-forces-capture-sirte/3581908

-=*=-

[article, v1:]
NTC official claims Gaddafi dead
Updated October 20, 2011 23:53:25

...
National Transitional Council official Abdel Majid Mlegta earlier said Gaddafi was captured and wounded in both legs as he tried to flee Sirte in a convoy which NATO warplanes attacked.

"He was also hit in his head," he said. "There was a lot of firing against his group and he died."

-=*=-

[article, v3:]
Gaddafi dragged out of sewer and shot in the head
Middle East correspondent Anne Barker, staff
Updated October 21, 2011 11:11:01

...
"At approximately 8:30am local time today, NATO aircraft struck two pro-Gaddafi forces military vehicles which were part of a larger group moving in the vicinity of Sirte," NATO military spokesman Colonel Roland Lavoie said.

"These armed vehicles were conducting military operations and presented a clear threat to civilians."

Comment 1: NATO flew something like 26,000 sorties into Libya. That's a lot of stopping "clear threats to civilians;" see my picture 'worth' more than a squillion words.

Comment 2: Note that forces crossing borders inbound are perpetrating aggression of the Nuremberg class.

Comment 3: Note that the headlines of each successive appearance in Just In are all different and mostly differ from those in the articles - why that?

Comment 4: Each of the (at least) three article-versions 'share' the same URL; it means that the 'superseded' articles disappear (and now that Google has dropped the caching function, we cannot even research the (recent) past to retrieve the original reports). This amounts to deliberately re-writing history by the AusBC = revisionism.

Comment 5: It's partly luck that I collected different versions. With AusBC setting out to delete their own history, we have some difficulty exposing their lies. Too bad; and anyway, the (dumbed-down) sheople just doze on.

Musing: Claim that Saddam's goons throwing babies out of humidicribs to die on the cold, stone floor. Claim that Hussein "fed people into huge shredders, feet first to prolong the agony". Claim that Saddam found in 'spider hole.' Then; snipers on roof-tops, mercenaries fed viagra in order to mass-rape, Gaddafi dragged out of sewer and shot in the head. Any common theme here? (Tip: Try 'filthy, propagandistic lies.')

Thesis: Barker usually operates in Z-ray Hell; guaranteed none of the reportage here is Barker's own 'eye-witness' news. Her job-description must include 'propagandiste' - here, she is putting up a smoke-screen excuse = 'killed in crossfire,' to try to let NATO/rebel-rabble off the murder-hook. Won't work, can't work; that's what US+NATO-F+UK are. Point: See how Barker/the AusBC insinuate their lies?

-=*=-

Something a bit different:

- TOP NEWS - (nyt eml 3mins ago, time of writing):

"Violent End to an Era as Qaddafi Dies in Libya"

Note the language: "Dies." (As opposed to 'killed,' say.)

-=*=-

Some confirmation:

Journalist's tweets: 'I saw Gaddafi's body'
Posted October 21, 2011 09:45:12 | Updated October 21, 2011 14:10:19

A journalist has revealed she chased the ambulance carrying Moamar Gaddafi's body, and saw the dictator's body in the back, describing him wearing gold pants and with a bullet wound in the chest.

Topics: unrest-conflict-and-war, world-politics, libyan-arab-jamahiriya
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2011-10-21/journalist-tweets-about-seeing-gaddafi27s-body/3591184

-=*=-

A souvenir:

Photo: NTC fighters hold what they claim to be Moamar Gaddafi's gold-plated pistol (see below.)

-=*=-

A predicted consequence:

Gaddafi death 'may cut' petrol prices in Australia
By Peter Ryan, Sue Lannin and staff
Posted October 21, 2011 14:24:50 | Updated October 21, 2011 15:07:33

There was little sustained reaction on oil markets following the death of former Libyan leader Moamar Gaddafi, but an end to conflict there could speed up the restoration of oil exports.

Topics: business-economics-and-finance, markets, oil-and-gas, unrest-conflict-and-war, libyan-arab-jamahiriya
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2011-10-21/gaddafi-oil-market/3591960

Comment 1; (bad): They did/do this for Iraq as well; 'Western' actions (mainly US + snivelling quisling sycophantic hangers-on (SQSH-Os)) are 'saving' *our* oil supplies (under Arab/Muslim sands) - so the claim. Q: Saving supplies from what? (Oil owners presumably must sell; and where else but on some open market?) A: Not 'from what' but 'for what,' where 'what' = economic rent (= sale-price - production-cost). Digging Iraqi oil up is estimated to cost ~$1,- but it is currently sold in the range $80-$120 (Murdoch said destroying Iraq would return the price to $25). The US (+SQSH-Os) want the lot = the total profit rip-off, from oily-sand to forecourt-fuel-bowsers = economic rent - less the 5% royalties, say - just like in Aus.

Comment 2; (worse): Aus buys oil/petrol mostly via Singapore at the Tapis base-price; this has recently been ~+33% to +25% over the cost of West Texas Crude. Why that; why such a wide range? Why should anything happening in the Mediterranean affect the Tapis-price?

Comment 3; (worst): We may spot a trend; US+NATO+SQSH-Os attacking oil-owners; Iran feared to be next. Q: Can (mostly) US-style capitalism not survive without murder/theft? A: Apparently not. While we are at it, Q: Can the I/J/Z-plex not survive without murder/theft? A: Apparently not. And the I/J/Z-plex either owns or controls or both, the US M/I/C/4-plex. We can see the point of maximum immorality.

-=*=-

Earlier, I posed the Q: Gaddafi died in custody - that OK with you?

From/via the AusBC, we read:

"His death, which came swiftly after his capture" - me: was it really some sort of an accident ('killed in crossfire' as the Barker/Just In/v3 headline has it) or actually more like a lynching = extrajudicial execution (recall ObL's somewhat untimely, definitely irregular end)?

Epitaph: A US-NATO-F+UK supported rabble has destroyed one of Africa's most advanced nations - murder for spoil (oil again? No, still).

There you have it (see photo below, notice the neat symbolism of the baseball caps?) - make your own conclusions, I know you will.

^
Update, 22Oct'11, 11:43; PS ...

Now had enough of US+NATO+SQSH-Os' barbarity on this round - I blog because I must; I cannot bear to do nothing in the face of such utter evil, I blog to document and comment, since it's 'the best I can do.' Others blog too, some much better than I can, so here's Escobar's effort via ICH.

[«back»]

Zs spread a disgusting, immoral stain over all humanity

2011-10-07T16:51:00.002+02:00

.. Z-ray-Hell ...

.. provides enduring proof ...

.. that we are ruled by psychopathic criminals

We, of the 'reality based' community, are neither amused, nor deceived.

The Zs' continuous, ghastly inhumanity to Palestinian ELO/Os (= forcefully, *illegally* dispossessed erstwhile legal owner/occupiers) - brings opprobrium (= public disgrace arising from someone's shameful conduct) onto *all* Js, *everywhere* - plus, of course, onto all supporters, apologists & bottle-washers. The theft of almost an entire country via genocidal, ethnic-cleansing oppression through Nuremberg-class criminality (the 'establishment' of Israel was a slow-motion, aggressive, armed-alien invasion = burglary/home invasion = murdering theft), including the deliberately lying hasbara deployed as cynical *attempted* 'cover-story,' will go down in history as *far, far* worse than the rightly despised 3rd Reich; hardly credible (for some) but nevertheless, *self-evidently true*.

(That paragraph all OK with *you*, personally?)

The *really* funny thing is that they (Zs&Co) thought that we'd never notice? Well, as long as the AusBC&Co (aka corrupt & venal MSM) had a monopoly on 'news' gatekeeper/dumbing-down functions, perhaps they may have had a chance (but snowball, Hell... word gets around.)

No way; at least not any more; even some of the TV-anaesthetised zombies are starting to wake up.

Proof: If the Zs had any valid claim, they'd be able to demonstrate legal land/property transfer via mutually agreed free & fair sale. So show us the title-deeds?

As if that wasn't bad enough, it gets worse, *far, far* worse. 1st, the *bloody* AusBC have misinformed this whole wide-brown, over my whole life - I 1st detected their lies (silly me; trust, fury, scorned) post 9/11 (suspected *inside job* = black-flag psyop), post Iraq, definitely *illegal invasion* thereof. Then we see bipartisan = un- & anti-democratic support of Z-ray-Hell by successive Aus governments. Not, of course, just Aus; UK & US were and are still involved, proven by Balfour (declaration) & Truman (same-day recognition of 'unilaterality', said to be 'for electoral reasons' = traitorous corruption of democracy), down to today with US continually arming the crims. Aus, UK & US; any more? Well, of course, (apart from other quisling sycophants) the UN - which(who) should have rescinded UNGA181 latest after Plan Dalet/Deir Yassin massacre etc. (such crimes continuing down to today) - incontrovertibly demonstrated the Zs' true colours.

GWBush: 'For or against!'

IF one is not actively *against* Israel, THEN one is *for* lying, thieving, *murdering* criminality = 'world-class' inhumanity (bad things can happen, when good people don't at the very least speak up).

No peace without justice - so when does the *moral, thinking* world smarten up?

the 1st cut is the deepest = treachery revealed

2011-08-27T11:21:00.000+02:00

.. some crims ...

  .. have dropped ...

    .. their mask (why that?)

Preamble; old joke, Q: How do you know when a politician is lying?

A: When you see their lips move.

It's not a very good joke, but it tells us something; see definition of lie[1].

Next Q: Who wants to be deceived?

It gets worse; the very fact that they set out to deceive us tells us that the project they are 'enhancing' with lies is not otherwise justifiable = at the very least it's some crooked scam, if not outright criminal. War, of course, is the worst; it *always* involves at least one aggressor, in the case of Afghanistan, Iraq and now Libya, the prime aggressor was the US, plus any number of snivelling quisling sycophantic hangers-on (SQSH-Os), in the case of the hapless Palestinians' Nakba, the aggressor was and still is the alien invading Zs and now their descendents, apologists & fellow-travellers. All, note, resource-wars = murdering for spoil.

Short & sweet; when they lie, they're admitting their guilt.

Resource-wars = murdering for spoil = smash and grab armed-theft including the murder of innocents. If you or I tried it, there'd be hell to pay. Why should the US & Zs + SQSH-Os get away with it? System = civilisation's so-called 'leadership' failure.

This leadership failure = corruption also includes the UN, which means we can't even call the cops; we have to do something ourselves. I suggest continuous condemnation plus economic action, together BDS = boycott, divestment & sanction. Where ever possible, do *not* buy any thing or service from the criminal countries. End preamble.

-=*=-

Article 1:

Lies Unmasked As UK Admits Boots On The Ground
Britain's SAS leads hunt for Gaddafi
Thomas Harding, Gordon Rayner, Damien Mcelroy
August 26, 2011
  «As a $1.6 million bounty was placed on his head, soldiers from 22 SAS Regiment began guiding rebel soldiers after being ordered in by the Prime Minister, David Cameron.
For the first time, defence sources have confirmed the SAS has been in Libya for several weeks, and played a key role in co-ordinating the battle for Tripoli.»
[ICH/smh]

Comment: This is an admission of earlier lies; an admission that they've exceeded their remit, and an admission that they have taken part in an aggressive invasion = Nuremberg = gallows.

Article 2:

Aug 27, 2011
THE ROVING EYE
R2P is now Right 2 Plunder
By Pepe Escobar
  «As for the Western "winners" in Libya, they are not even playing smoke and mirrors anymore. Richard Haass, president of that Gotha of the US establishment that is the Council on Foreign Relations, wrote a Financial Times op-ed blatantly stating, "The 'humanitarian' intervention introduced to save lives believed to be threatened was in fact a political intervention introduced to bring about regime change."
As for those lowly bit part local actors - Libyans from Cyrenaica - Haass already dispatched them to the dustbin of history: "Libyans will not be able to manage the situation about to emerge on their own", and with "two million barrels of oil a day" at stake, the only solution is an "international force". Translation: occupation army - as in Afghanistan and Iraq. Welcome to neo-colonialism 2.0.»
[atimes/Escobar]

Comment: Howard told us that invading Iraq was *not* about regime-change, and he enhanced *that* lie with his stories of Saddam's 'human shredders.' Same as above; he sent 'our boys' to take part in an aggressive invasion = Nuremberg = gallows.

-=*=-

They follow a 'standard-pattern narrative;' select the target, vilify, attack, murder to steal = plunder[2].

Vilification is easiest done by causing shocked revulsion; see 'stories' of human shredders, snipers hiding on roof-tops, mercenaries revved-up on Viagra raping innocent girls. Vilification is easiest done via and actively assisted by the corrupt & venal MSM, sadly including parts of 'our' AusBC, and propagandists like Barker.

They, our corrupt 'leaders,' seem to need public 'support' (did not get it beforehand on Iraq), then once the crime is underway, they exhort us to 'support the troops' (except they lied that their troops were in Libya - until now). Lies, lies & more lies, intermingled with their filthy, murdering crimes. If public 'support' - or merely resignation is acquired, it makes the public as guilty as the leaders via the accessory mechanism. That's why we must never cease to see through their plots, never cease to criticise = decry their crimes, and call for justice, like restoring Palestinians to their country, stolen at the point of a gun by invading Zs, ditto for the Afghans, Iraqis & now Libyans, invaded and smashed by the criminal US-regime & crooked entourage.

Fazit: They, our corrupt 'leaders,' (at least in UK) have now admitted to Nuremberg-class war crimes, scratching my head as to why the admission. I can say 'told you so,' see my Shockin' Whore Mk2 of 20Mar'11. Where we go from here depends on the decent among us; accept, acquiesce or reject; bring the perpetrators to justice or let 'em off? Up to each individual 'you.'

-=*end*=-

Ref(s):

[1] lie2  -n. 1 intentionally false statement (tell a lie). 2 something that deceives. -v. (lies, lied, lying) 1 tell a lie or lies. 2 (of a thing) be deceptive.  give the lie to show the falsity of (a supposition etc.). [Old English] [POD]

[2] plunder  -v. 1 rob or steal, esp. in wartime; loot. 2 exploit (another person's or common property) for one's own profit. -n. 1 activity of plundering. 2 property so acquired. [German plündern] [ibid.]

when push comes to shove 'our' awful aunty AusBC walks over cadavers

2011-08-26T18:51:00.002+02:00

.. am I mad ...

  .. or is it them? ...

    .. I don't lie or kill -> it's them

Thesis/Subtitle: How long must we wait until sanity - and decency - is restored?

-=*=-

Nigger, d**k hanging in glass of curdled milk.

Passer-by: Hey, man - what you do'n?

Nigger: Ah'm f**k'n dis custard.

Trigger article 1:

Rebel celebrations wreak havoc on Qaddafi's compound
Updated August 24, 2011 10:09:00
Rebel fighters drive through Tripoli
(Anne Barker)
  «Their forces rushed in, cheering and firing their guns in the air.
With scenes similar to the fall of Baghdad, the Libyan forces set about destroying a statue of Muammar Gaddafi.»
[AusBC/Barker]

Comment: Read it yourself. The propaganda was that G was attacking his own people (snipers, containers of Viagra), my bet is that it was much more the other way; pig-higorants shooting their gifted weapons at anything, nothing, and d*g help you if you were anywhere at all in range. We saw the pictures (US-style pick-ups, humungous weapons welded-on (careful in the round-abouts)), and speaking of which, by whom and how were the TV videos made, of berserkers imitating US-grunts, kicking doors in, guns at the obvious ready? Or down putative 'spider holes,' braving mines and/or ambush? A: True heroes, or Hollywood crews out on a (faked) lark?

Trigger article 2:

Rebels find Gaddafi's 'creepy' Condoleezza scrapbook
Updated August 26, 2011 23:12:02
  «Among the pictures in the album are a series of photos of Dr Rice and Colonel Gaddafi during their 2008 diplomatic talks in Tripoli.»
[AusBC/'news']

Comment: Read it yourself. Not only Rice, but Blair et al., any number of snivelling quisling sycophantic hangers-on. Were they insincere then, now, or both?

-=*=-

Barker is an AusBC propagandist, see my previous post here. Every time she's 'allowed' an article on Iran, she inevitably includes something like: 'The west suspects Iran of wanting an A-bomb.' (This, despite the consensus of all 17(?) US 'intel' agencies: "Not!") She 'jumped' from the ME to London (riots; AusBC support for Cameron) sometime between Aug 3 and 10, now between Aug 19 and 23 to Libya. The 'girl' gets around - possibly because she has no ties-that-bind. If you saw a picture, you might understand her apparent preference for radio.

-=*=-

Back to Libya:

True, Gaddafi may not be dead yet; no so-called (Hollywood-cast) 'spider-hole,' no kangaroo court, no lynching filmed on mobile-'phone - yet. But with the NATO-sponsored rebel-rabble 'leadership' posting a $1.x mio 'dead or alive' reward, it won't be long. So much for civilisation, and US-NATO-F+UK 'ethical' support.

Worse than troglodytes; Libya had good education, lots of social programs, medical etc.. But they were thoroughly propagandised: 'You wanna be free!' (Don't we all, of lies & rip-offs.) Not just 'wanna,' they were helped - by 5mths aerial bombardment, then at the end, a NATO ship, brings the duds to Tripoli, while NATO helicopter gun-ships clear the way in front of them. Real 'men.' (Psst guys! Look for the containers filled with 'blueies!')

More like vicious ingrates. (For those with neither education nor dictionary: ingratitude  n. lack of due gratitude.[POD])

AusBC + Anne Barker = propaganda

2011-08-13T13:31:00.001+02:00

.. we just ...

.. do not do ...

.. coincidences

Preamble 1; from my uk riots: A proper "of, by, for the people etc." democracy requires at least these three; 1) an informed & engaged electorate, 2) full & free info-flows, and 3) a wide range of honest candidates who, if/when elected, represent the electorate by implementing the will of the majority, protecting any minorities. Our, i.e. US, UK, Aus and other such 'pretend democracy' rogue-regimes, fail all three. Deliberately dumbed-down citizens, distracted by trivia & disinformation on TV, a corrupt & venal MSM (did anyone mention Murdoch?), and most representatives sell-out to the highest bidder, usually corporations but worst-case, the "Israel Lobby."

Preamble 2: Back in the early 70s, I had a 'debate' with a friend on the ME problem, whereby I took a pro-Z approach. I was wrong, as wrong as wrong could be. *Why* I was wrong, was because I had based my arguments on what I had learned from 'reports' in the media, almost exclusively from the AusBC. Since I was wrong, so the info I had been 'fed' was wrong; this forms my prima facie case against the AusBC. Nothing of significance has changed much in the meantime - and further, that both the AusBC and the various Aus governments follow a pro-Z 'line' forms a prima facie case showing collusion, and since the Zs are criminal, this pro-Z collusion forms a conspiracy - primarily against truth & justice for the hapless Palestinians, but also against us, we the sheople, since by and large we are not criminal and do not wish to support or even associate with criminals.

-=*=-

Now, to Anne Barker. She had a 'wonderful' start to her stint as ME-correspondent; she was observing a demo by extremist Z-settlers (aka illegal occupiers) - and was spat upon by same extremist Z-settlers. But she persevered, regularly reporting from the ME - including, wherever possible, propagandist digs with a pro-Z slant and/or a pro-US regime slant - note that any slant = bias, and since the Z and US regimes are rogue, Barker's slant is, as the AusBC's itself in general, against we the sheople's interests. The easiest way to prove this is to Google for: iran nuclear weapon "the west" "Anne Barker" site:abc.net.au - which just returned "About 105 results (0.20 secs)". Q: Why is this propagandistic? A: Because it is the agreed verdict of the entire US-intelligence community, that Iran does *not* have a nuclear weapons program. Certain parties, namely the rogue Z-regime and the US-neoCons plus hangers-on & apologists wish to attack Iran; Barker's propaganda aligns with such wishes, quote; "The moves coincide with Iranian warnings against any attack. Its arch-foes, the United States and Israel, have not ruled out taking military action over Tehran's controversial nuclear program." Note the language; 'arch-foes,' 'military action.' Note the allegation; "controversial nuclear program" - which, whatever it is, is known *not* to be for weapons, see US-intel. Iran is under continual aggressive attack by rogue-regimes; has been since at least 1953 when the vile US/UK meddlers deposed the democratically elected Mossadegh. Not so BTW; Iran has oil, as does Iraq & Libya - as if you didn't know.

Another; "ANNE BARKER: ... But 20 per cent enriched uranium is enough to produce a weapon if there's a big enough quantity ..."

Me: What rubbish; criminal, inflammatory & *wrong* propagandist-rubbish. Yet this is what is passed off by the AusBC as 'responsible reporting.'

Now Anne Barker the ME-propagandist has a new assignment, see [1].

Clarification: I am a seeker after truth & justice; I present 'facts as I see them' (i.e. as reported), along with analysis/opinion based on my observations, i.e. all care but no responsibility; kindly do not shoot this messenger.

One report I saw, initially regarded with a bit of suspicion, alleged that these riots came at a 'good' time for an under-pressure Cameron, creating public outrage and thus allowing him to go 'tough on crime,' always good for politicians. The article further alleged that the police deliberately hung back, allowing the riots and looting to develop. I must admit that the scale as seen on TV was impressive, with entire blocks burning (how did they achieve that?); described as 'worst since the Blitz.' Perhaps the article was not too far off the mark after all; you could try looking here with follow-up article here.

Summary: Several coincidences, each getting less 'believable' (believing is what some people do in the absence of evidence); that the riots could take place at all, that they could be so impressive, that that suits both Cameron's & the militarised police's interests - *plus* the arrival on the scene of an AusBC propagandist. Make you go hmmm?

-=*end*=-

PS Moral 1: IF anyone violates the 'democratic covenant' - by telling us lies, say, since a mal-informed electorate may not make properly informed decisions, THEN they make themselves 'democratic criminals' - and thus we the people's enemies.

PPS Moral 2: Cameron&Co are (rightly) outraged by a few looters, armed with little more than sticks & BiCs. Q: What of the poor Libyan people, being attacked by NATO; more specifically, mainly F + UK, using the most modern aerial weapons, after the US cruise-missiles reduced Libya's air-defences to smouldering rubble? A: We can see who the really serious criminals are.

-=*=-

[1] List of recent Barker articles at time of writing - basically, just for the where/when:

{

UK defence lawyer says harsh riot sentences not the norm

ABC Online - 8 minutes ago

ANNE BARKER: I hear what you're saying that most of these are perhaps not representative but where we are seeing it; how can you justify such harsher sentences ...

UK police and courts under fire for handling of riots

ABC Online - 3 hours ago

ANNE BARKER: In the days since the mob violence spiralled out of control, British police, almost as much as the rioters, have come in for a pasting. ...

UK defence lawyer says harsh riot sentences not the norm

ABC Online - 3 hours ago

ANNE BARKER: I hear what you're saying that most of these are perhaps not representative but where we are seeing it; ...

British rioters face court

ABC Online - 19 hours ago

Our correspondent, Anne Barker, joins me now from London. They're running night courts aren't they? ...

British PM flags tough measures to fight street crime

ABC Online - Aug 11, 2011

ANNE BARKER: One of the most harrowing scenes from this week's riots captured on video was the attack on a young Malaysian student in London ...

UK PM flags tough response to rioting

ABC Online - Aug 10, 2011

ANNE BARKER: As British police struggle with the wave of looting and destruction authorities are confronting a broader question; ...

Mubarak trial begins

ABC Online - Aug 3, 2011

Our Middle-East correspondent Anne Barker is covering the trial and joins me now. ...

Mubarak trial imminent

ABC Online - Aug 2, 2011

ANNE BARKER: The security presence on Cairo's streets is visibly tight. The courtroom has been readied for one of the biggest cases in Egyptian history. ...

World condemns Syrian violence

ABC Online - Anne Barker - Aug 1, 2011

ANNE BARKER, REPORTER: The streets of Hama have turned into a war zone since Syrian troops stepped up their military crackdown on anti-Government demonstrations. ...

Deadly crackdown on Syrian protestors

ABC Online - Jul 31, 2011

ANNE BARKER: The city of Hama has been under siege for weeks since residents there turned out for some of the biggest protests seen in Syria since the uprising began in March ...

Islamist groups dominate protests in Cairo

ABC Online - Jul 29, 2011

ANNE BARKER: For months Egyptians from all religious and ethnic groups have been united in their campaign for democracy and change. ...

Mubarak trial in doubt

ABC Online - Jul 27, 2011

ANNE BARKER: For weeks now Egyptian protesters have been back on the streets in Cairo and other cities, ramping up their demands for faster reform. ...

Israelis press government on home truths

ABC Online - Jul 26, 2011

ANNE BARKER: This is Rothschild Boulevard, the poshest street in Tel Aviv which is one of the most affluent cities in the Middle East. ...

Egyptians protest at slow pace of reform

ABC Online - Jul 19, 2011

Middle East correspondent Anne Barker has just returned from Cairo and filed this report ...

}

trick & (re)treat can the jokester Obama push the Zs back behind pre'67 borders?

2011-05-20T11:13:00.001+02:00

.. after 63+ bloody years ...

  .. ethnically cleansing Palestine ...

    .. giving up even 1cm² would give Zs seizures

Putative subtitle: White man speak with forked-tongue.

This subtitle could be considered prima facie racist, but given a) that the US was built on land ethnically cleansed of its pre-European invasion natives, b) Israel is built on land ethnically cleansed of its pre-Zionist invasion natives and c) the Zionists' recognition-demand bleatings themselves include an undeniably racist term[1], it's not me who suffers from "deep-rooted racism."

-=*=-

Trigger article:

Obama delivers Middle East peace vision
By Jane Cowan and Anne Barker
Updated May 20, 2011 09:53:00
  «Barack Obama presented his most detailed vision yet on the path to Israeli-Palestinian peace.»
[AusBC/justin]

Comment: 63+ bloody, and bloody-well unsuccessful years of 'peace-process' stories, via and *assisted* by the AusBC, and *NO* visible change except Zionist outwards border 'creep' should tell us of a) the competency of the 'players' and/or b) the not-so hidden agendas they have 'in play.'

The Z-demands are always the same, and note the language: "demands," as opposed to the normal negotiation process of exchanging offers to compromise?

Z-apologist-demand #1: The right to exist.

Q #1: Why? UNGA181 offered a 'Jewish homeland' in a partition of Palestine; it did *not* envisage any diminution of the “civil and religious rights of [the] existing non-Jewish” Arab majority there, nor did it sanction any use of force. Once Plan Dalet & Deir Yassin-type massacres showed the Zionists' true colours, the 'Zionist project' should have been terminated (by the UN) to prevent the murdering ethnic cleansing which took place and still continues. Deir Yassin-type massacres are clearly illegal (as well as utterly immoral), and *cancel* any claimed 'right to exist,' as criminal acts extirpate all rights (except to a fair trial). Lacking legitimacy, all subsequent Zionist claims must fail.

Z-apologist-demand #2: The right to claim land won in a 'civil war.'

Q #2: Why? a) In the 1st place, the Zionists were overwhelmingly newly arrived immigrants. When new arrivals attack local natives, that's referred to as an 'alien invasion' = aggressive = Nuremberg. In the 2nd place, UNSCR242 refers to the "inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war."  b) Land(property) may only be acquired by free&fair exchange; all improperly alienated land(property) should revest.

Z-apologist-demand #3: The right to unilaterally declare independence.

Q #3: Why? a) Following #1 = illegitimacy, nothing remains except to be brought to justice. b) May a burglar/home-invader declare their independence from justice? Absurd. Yet not merely 'tolerated' but supported by the US + sycophant-quisling regimes. It's called condoning crime.

Z-apologist-demand #4: The right to defend.

Q #4: Why? See #3, depending on #1 = illegitimacy = all rights extirpated. The correct response to a burglary/home-invasion is not to arm the criminals, but to send in the SWAT teams, to arrest and bring to trial. (Compare Abbottobad perversion of justice.)

Terminology: Alien invader-murderers for spoil = AIMs4S; this clearly fits the Zionist project perpetrators in Palestine. The hapless victims are erstwhile legal owner/occupiers = ELO/Os. Given the Deir Yassin-type massacres, more or less continuously down to the most recent outrage = shooting many unarmed Nakba-demonstrators dead, Q: what right did they ever have to renaming the ethnically-cleansed part of Palestine to Israel? A: IMHO none, no rights at all.

Comment: The Zionist project = Israel is clearly illegitimate. In UNGA273, Israel promised to honour UNGA181 (respect ELO/Os' rights) & UNGA194 (ELO/Os' right of return). That the Zionist AIMs4S violate their own promises is unremarkable, since lying is a minor sin compared to murdering theft.

Comment: That Obama may change the Zionists' modus operandi, let alone criminal course, is on the face of it risible = fails the 'giggle-test;' rage and threats from Israeli extremists are the 1st visible responses.

Fazit: There can be no peace without justice = finally respect ELO/Os' rights, and their right of return, their improperly alienated property to revest and/or a fair recompense and reparations. The US & UN both could earn some credibility; the Zs could begin a retreat from complete pariah-status. The Zs could start with a sincere "Sorry!"

[1]

and when they were bad, they were horrid [US&Z rogue regimes - propaganda, black- & psy-ops = lies]

2011-05-16T16:51:00.005+02:00

.. the 'winning' ...

  .. doesn't really end ...

    .. until the gloating is done

Subtitle, 1: Out of the mouths of babes - err, crooks.

Subtitle, 2; Q: Who's to blame?

Thesis: Those who murder for spoil have zero qualms about lying; proof = no-one (in their right-mind) admits to crime, so lie the guilty ones must. Lying is per definition done to deceive, and when deceived by politicians, voters may not make properly informed voting decisions at least in the lying context, and not at all if the credibility of the candidate is deemed vital (what else? Vote for a liar?) Thanks, but "No, thanks!" to JWHoward, we in Aus had the super-cynical mantra "All politicians lie!" imposed upon us - the 'all' may tend to hyperbole, but the particular was repeatedly demonstrated (i.e. the baseless 'Saddam uses people-shredders!' allegation = 'misleading the house' - and with it, the country) - why is it so? No worthwhile project ever requires propaganda-camouflage, yet we are continually being assaulted by lies. The lies are organised around 'narratives,' to keep them on-song and (often imperfectly) non-contradictory, like the lame fog-of-war 'extenuations' recently deployed; the 'lie-cloud' forms the pushed-propaganda paradigm = the perpetrators' own created perversion of reality.

The 'standard' crimes are cheating, theft and murder; lies are both the gateway and a give-away to criminal depredations.

-=*=-

Trigger article:

- TOP NEWS -
Israeli Troops Fire as Marchers Breach Borders
  «Israel's borders erupted into deadly clashes as thousands of Palestinians marched from Syria, Lebanon, Gaza and the West Bank.»
[nytimes/eml]

Note the nytimes' language; "Breach," say. It is a 'biased' term[1] with ideological/aggressive 'baggage,' also with its alternates[2], a more neutral and simpler 'crossed' would work better = be more accurate. But propaganda uses such 'coloured' terms for the desired (usually as here -ve) effects, although the opposite = +ve also occurs; i.e. "Land of the free, home of the brave." Oh, yeah: Free as in free to be denied medical treatment without a credit card, and/or to have their jobs shipped o/s, brave as in shooting unarmed civilians - not 'just' ObL, but the 100s of 1000s if not millions who have been killed/slaughtered as hapless 'collaterals' resulting from US wars for spoil. Here, the hyped +ves are actually -ves; more lies.

Comment 1: The headline is enough at the moment. 'Normal' people, even if traumatised by 63+ bloody years of murderingly violent dispossession and oppression, are nevertheless assumed to be non-idiotic; any demonstrator carrying anything that even remotely looked like a weapon would be seeking their martyr-hood in a hurry. Ergo, we can assume that the 'invading' Palestinians were unarmed, and were carrying out a peaceful demonstration; perhaps calling out "Return *our* land to us ELO/Os, the erstwhile legal owner/occupiers! - Observe UNGA181 & UNGA194, like you *promised* to, in UNGA273!" Also possibly "All AIMs4S (and descendants) to return to whence they came!"

Comment 2: Some say that Israel sits on stolen land; can we confirm/deny? Generally, land&property are alienable (adj. Law able to be transferred to new ownership [POD]), the 'normal' way is by *voluntary* exchange; $s for soil, say. UNSCR242 includes the "inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war." Under the principle of "A fair exchange is no robbery," Q: Why are the Palestinians still trying to get their improperly alienated land/property back = revested (reinstate, restore, return)? More: "Revesting and restitution of property on conviction." (Aye, there's the rub: Actually achieving justice.) IMHO, 'confirmed.'

Comment 3: No burglar or violent home-invader may declare him/herself independent of justice; no alien invaders may ethnically cleanse via genocidal attacks - and remain 'legal' - let alone moral. Latest with the vile Deir Yassin massacre and such-like terrorist attacks (similar continuing down to today - or if not exactly today, then some immediate yesterday and tomorrow), the UN should have halted the crime that is the Zionist project (the UN did attempt a recovery with UNGA194, sadly failed = lack of application); *unless* the UN gets serious and stops wars & injustices, THEN it is what it appears to be, namely a total sham and worse, actually in the service of - *rogue* regimes, see the current neo-colonialist, UNSC-sanctioned attacks on Libya. As I wrote on 20Mar'11 in Shockin' Whore Mk2, it's Iraq (murder for oil) all over again, this time in slow-motion (AusBC: "Britain wants NATO to ramp up attacks against Moamar Gaddafi's regime in Libya by attacking electricity grids, roads and even oil supplies.") Me: Gives new meaning to 'revolting.' These *aggressive attackers* are out of all control. Why? Who lets 'em? Not me, matey.

-=*=-

Propaganda is old; a mini-review:

This story may begin with a deployed lie: "Making the world safe for democracy!" This was a 'mantra' used by Wilson during WW1 to 'convince' the US public that joining the war against "the Boche" was a good idea. Water well under the bridge, but the real questions are two: Why did Wilson have to 'sell' the war anyway, with the 2nd, more sinister Q: Why did Wilson himself want war? A: Same-old same-old, see the modern, wicked M/I/C/4-plex; this tiny minority gets *richer*, while lots of the cannon-fodder gets *killed*, not to mention the squillion *innocent* collaterals. The significant thing is that Wilson's "Making the world safe ..." was a trick then, as it still is a trick today; proof = it's still being deployed. But it's not 'merely' a trick; it's also a lie, easily proven: A tricked = deceived electorate cannot vote 'straight' (hence the derived jibe: JWHoward ‘couldn't lie straight in bed.’)

Bernays was fascinated by the Wilson mantra, and even more so because of its effects. He was sooo fascinated that he turned it into a career, morphing 'propaganda' into PR = public relations, because of the extremely negative connotations of propaganda; usually rotten lies. Bernays was successful; perhaps his most infamous stunt was convincing women that they could smoke tobacco & get away with it. Note that a lot of "convince ... get away with" is still going on.

To illustrate some negativity here, consider this:

  «In his 1928 book, "Propaganda," he wrote:
"The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country."»
[frugalmarketing/John Forde]

Comment: As for an electorate deceived, so for one 'manipulated.' Bernays based his thinking on some of Freud's work, he of the 'un- and sub-conscious.' The theory went that the 'free' masses, with their unconscious drives would (somehow??!) run amok, so the masses could not be allowed to be free, and that meant crippling 'democracies' by the aforesaid manipulations via deceptions = propaganda = lies. A neater, more self-serving policy could hardly be imagined, proof = this one is still 'running,' and how.

Next bit:

  «First is simply that this kind of deeper selling to the subconscious can be used in all kinds of ways, not all of them good.
Joseph Goebbels, for instance, would later use another Bernays book, "Crystallizing Public Opinion," to sway desperate Germans toward Hitler's murderous agenda.»
[frugalmarketing/John Forde, ibid.]

Which leads directly to "The Big Lie."

[Pause, for reflection...]

Q: OK, how big?

A: Humongous!

-=*=-

A "Big Lie" doesn't even have to be prima facie 'believable' - just as long as it has enough 'shock value' to 'flip' the listeners into an *emotional*, outraged state. It's the essence of Freud's 'un- and sub-conscious' but in reverse; recalling that 'belief' is done in the absence of *evidence*, here 'belief' is invoked (via lies) in the absence of *intelligence*, any available intelligence having been *switched-off* (another 'novel' = newly deployed propaganda-construct) - by the emotional shock. Example: Dumping babies out of incubators to steal such incubators away, abandoning the babies to death on a cold, stone floor. The story was 'presented' (= conduited, assisted) by the MSM as 'news' = truth - but was later proven false, demonstrating the 4th Estate's corrupt & venal modus operandi. Example: Saddam's totally non-existent WMDs. Example: Libyan snipers, firing on innocents from roof-tops. Example: Women (wives!) as 'human shields.' Example: IMF chief rapes hotel-maid. Q: Are they mad? A: Yes; those who murder for spoil have zero qualms about lying. And they can do all of these viciously criminal things because they are psychopaths, possibly resulting from faulty socialisation, *OR*: Are they deliberately, malevolently 'produced' by deliberate 'manipulation' of their 'un- and sub-conscious' *immature* minds? Whatever; vile monsters is what they are.

And apart from their murders for spoil (Zs = soil, US = oil), they are killing our once jewel-like planet's ecosphere, by revving-up CO2 production, instead of going sustainable.

I realised the other day that I keep asking questions like "Why," precisely because we're all being kept mostly in the dark - by being told outright lies, as well as having critical info withheld. Q: Why? A: Beats me (rich getting richer in the face of utter catastrophe tends to 'flip' me into an *emotional*, outraged state) - and that ain't too flash, I'll tell ya - 'for free.'

-=*end*=-

PS; Q: Who's to blame?

A: All the liars.

The M/I/C/4-plex = Military, Industrial, Congress (US for 'parliament'), the 4th Estate = corrupt & venal MSM + AusBC et al..

The I/J/Z-plex should be self-explanatory; criminal key is Zionism.

The AIMs4S = alien/aggressor invading-murderers for spoil.

The schools producing the psychologists = PR-types.

The schools producing the economists = banksters.

The sheople for their damnable 'incuriosity.'

But not me; I see the evil, and blog it.

It's the best I can do - and you?

-=*=-

Ref(s):

[1] breach  -n. 1 (often foll. by of) breaking or non-observation of a law, contract, etc. 2 breaking of relations; quarrel. 3 opening, gap. -v. 1 break through; make a gap in. 2 break (a law, contract, etc.).  step into the breach help in a crisis, esp. as a replacement. [Germanic: related to *break] [POD]

[2] breach verb
1 the river breached its bank
BREAK (THROUGH), burst (through), rupture, force itself through, split; informal bust.
2 the proposed changes breached trade union rules
BREAK, contravene, violate, fail to comply with, infringe, transgress against; defy, disobey, flout, fly in the face of; law infract. [New Oxford Thesaurus]

kill unarmed 'ObL' = black-op = psyop

2011-05-14T11:14:00.000+02:00

.. they killed someone ...

  .. dumped the body ...

    .. or, so they say

Thesis: IF they tell lies THEN their credibility crashes-and-burns.

-=*=-

Trigger article:

Porn stash found in bin Laden hideout
Posted May 14, 2011 07:33:00 | Updated May 14, 2011 07:32:00
  «A stash of pornography was found in the Pakistan hideout of Osama bin Laden by the commandos who killed him, United States officials said.»
[AusBC/justin]

Comment 1: Note the language; "stash," "hideout."

Comment 2: Refer "The Big Lie."

Comment 3: They also said "human shield," later admitted to be - err, an 'error' = outright lie.

Q: What's next?

Possible A: ObL murdered children to use their blood in certain aspects of his dialysis: "Saddam sent me the best from Kuwaiti incubators," the unarmed ObL was saying, as the US Navy SEAL extra-judicial kill-team = death-squad burst into his bedroom, their .45 magnum assault-MGs splashing hot-lead around everywhere; legs, heads - who cares?
You may do your own search ...

The Demon Zionists (continued)

2009-09-21T10:28:00.000+02:00

By Ernest William Graham (continued from "The Demon Zionists")

G'day ID, this is a copy of what I sent to "Yourdemocracy".

G'day Gus,
Isn't the "Nazi Salute" merely a copy of the Roman Emperor’s? And the Nazi banners and marches a copy the Americans with troops the width of the roadway they use? A show of power?

What I am trying to say here Gus is that the demands by the Zionists with respect to the removal of freedom of expression, merely because it offends them personally, actually supports the theory that they consider themselves the "untouchables"?

I originally came into this debate about occupied Palestine - because of the way the Zionists had cast aside the principles of the U.N. Charter and common decency for a time now exceeding 60 years. They have acted consistently with lies, deceit, guile and contempt for right and wrong.

It actually beggars belief that these centuries’ old procedures of claiming that anything that is not conducive to their independent military plans (while they interfere with others) self pity (while they deny even a modicum of that to their chosen enemies) and Nazi/Apartheid policies (which they are repeating even as we write) - should be punished.

All decent human beings will be increasing their sympathies to the victims of the Zionists – as it should be. A contemporary world, misguided by the U.S. principles of “blame your enemy for doing what you are really doing yourself” is hopefully being exposed by people having access to sites such as this.

And I steal John Richardson's quote of Emile Zola ...
If we shut up truth & bury it under the ground, it will but grow, & gather to itself such explosive power that the day it bursts through, it will blow up everything in its way.

That reminds one of the recorded speeches of such peaceful people as Ben Gurion, Golda Meir and that humanitarian Lieberman.

Netanyahu and his cohorts should consider that their rape and murder of the Palestinians may forever be remembered in the pages of non-Jewish history, even to a point which may expose the shameful part of it that they so deceitfully claim as only their “Holocaust” – not a Holocaust against humanity itself – just them! Fair dinkum.

Any deceit citizen of this world of ours must have an opinion of what is right or wrong?

Cheers mate. God bless Australia. NE OUBLIE.

the AusBC & denying the Holocaust (US, Z-rael vs. Iran)

2009-09-19T12:47:00.013+02:00

.. this is *far* too serious ...

  .. for playing games with it ...

    .. yet the AusBC serially offends

-=*=-

[PPS added]

-=*=-

Preamble: A properly functioning democracy vitally depends, amongst other things, on complete and honest reporting of facts, free speech involving the exchange of validly-based opinions and the identification of lies and other distortions; censorship[0] in this context does *not* belong. Forbidding discussion of denial[1] of the Holocaust[2] or 9/11 'conspiracy' and/or 'false flag' theories, say, is not 'just' antidemocratic, but that in the extreme. Yet such forbidding occurs in some (dark, repressive) corners, as does the terming of *validly based* criticism of Z-rael 'anti-Semitic[3].' The latter is doubly erroneous; the word Semite[4] describes both Jews and Arabs - and as being related to each other, to boot. (When a Jew kills an Arab, he is (metaphorically) killing 'a brother' - nothing new there; move on!)

In particular, pushing lying propaganda and/or censoring vital truths cannot help but harm any entity based on justice via truth - as we assume that our democracies bloody-well ought to be.

-=*=-

Consider snips from the following three reports:

1. US blasts Ahmadinejad's Holocaust dismissal
By Washington correspondent Kim Landers
Posted September 19, 2009 05:00:00
  «At a Tehran University at the end of an annual anti-Israel "Qods [Jerusalem] Day" rally, the Iranian leader said: "The pretext [Holocaust] for the creation of the Zionist regime [Israel] is false... It is a lie based on an unprovable and mythical claim."
"Confronting the Zionist regime is a national and religious duty."
...
"We condemn what he said and I would point to what the President said in Cairo - denying the holocaust will isolate Iran further from the world," Mr Gibbs said.»
[AusBC/justin]

2. GMT: 9/18/2009 10:50:44 AM
President: Holocaust black box should be opened
Tehran, Sept 18, IRNA
  «He added, "The pretext for establishing the Zionist regime is a lie; a lie which relies on an unreliable claim, a mythical claim, and the occupation of Palestine has nothing to do with the Holocaust."»
[irna.ir]

Note: The quotes *do not match*, why not? A search for "It is a lie based on an unprovable and mythical claim" site:.ir finds no hits, but a search for "a lie which relies on an unreliable claim" site:.ir gets 4. Who would have the 'better,' more authoritative translation? But that's a 'small' worry; see more below.

3. Ahmadinejad wants global front against Israel
Fri, 18 Sep 2009 09:46:45 GMT
  «"The Zionist regime is the symbol of lies and deception," which was founded on 'colonialist' attitudes, President Ahmadinejad added.
...
The president then went on to question the story behind the Holocaust and urged a probe into it.
"If the Holocaust, as you claim, is true, why don't you allow a probe into the issue?"»
[presstv.ir]

Note: Saying "IF (some question) THEN (some conclusion)" is *not* denial. Ahmadinejad (validly!) queries why some queries are not permitted, i.e. queries why genuine queries should be censored.

Discussion: As usual, one should read *all* of the cited articles. Then, the most pressing question, the most damning allegation, is of "Holocaust denial." That's what it's all about, does he or doesn't he? Attempting an answer is *not* helped by poor and/or un-attributed quotes; where/how does the Anglo/Judaic press, *known to be (criminally!) biased* get their inputs?

Finally (here), does the AusBC quote (if true) prove denial? IMHO, not. "The pretext," Oh, so cynically deployed by Zs certainly includes the Holocaust, but note that "The pretext" in (1) has "[Holocaust]" inserted (erroneously implying that the Holocaust itself is a lie); Ahmadinejad's statement quoted in (2) above equates "The pretext" directly with "lie." The two statements are *quite* different. Comment: Yes, the Holocaust was bad. No, the Holocaust was never reason to dispossess the pre-'47/8 legitimate owner/occupiers of Palestine - the UN itself acted immorally, if not illegally. IMHO, that is exactly Ahmadinejad's point. Then, having got a foot in the '47/8 door, the Zs proceeded to illegally dispossess ever more hapless Palestinians; genocide, ethnic cleansing, apartheid, etc. are all present now, as they have been for all of the 61+ bloody years since '47/8 = Z-murder for land-theft. *All* Israelis, *all* non-effectively protesting Jews everywhere - also in the so-called Diaspora[5] carry both the responsibility and the blame for these vicious Z-crimes (*not* to protest, and that *effectively*, is to extend (tacit) support) - and *all* will 'wear' the ignominy for as long as the crimes continue - and of course, without *complete* 'reconciliation' well beyond = possibly forever damned.

Ahmadinejad may be being deliberately provocative - but if he wished to deny the Holocaust, Q: Why doesn't he deny it boldly, baldly, directly? He is certainly otherwise outspoken... A: IMHO, because he *doesn't* deny it; he plays with the Z's (criminal!) perfidy.

-=*=-

It took me not much more than 15mins, from reading the 1st to finding the 2nd two. I'm an amateur seeker of truth; the AusBC are (supposedly) professionals. Yet their report seems to ignore and/or distort - or at least, takes no notice of - the info available in the 2nd two reports - why?

The previous sentence may be being too kind. I charge the AusBC with pushing deliberate distortions (aka lying) in the name of propagandising us, we the sheople - the ultimate source of the AusBC's dough. In a 'normal,' i.e. honest business, any and all employees discovered lying would instantly be sacked.

-=*end*=-

PS The AusBC language is both bizarre and inflammatory: "blasts" would be far better written "criticised." The AusBC does idiotic things like this all the time- boo! Hiss! Traitorous, anti-democratic bastards.

PPS Recall that this semantic 'storm in a teacup' - but containing the most ugly allegations - is not driven by Ahmadinejad, although he is being just that little bit naughty. Nooo, it (the semantic 'perfect' storm - of filthy lies, immoral propaganda, illegal threats "All options!" etc. - all aimed at vilifying Iran) is being driven by the so-called 'world leader,' revved-up by its illegitimate sprog, and the not so 'secret agenda' is ultimately to attack Iran and steal its 'patrimony' too, as the already well under way illegal, immoral invasion/brutal occupation of Iraq has shown. All this, while the US & Z-rael can't/won't *buy* what they want, Oh no; rather than buy, they set out to steal via murdering force. How utterly charming!

Their obvious motto: "Have guns; will & do murder to steal."

-=*=-

Ref(s):

[0] censor —n. official authorized to suppress or expurgate books, films, news, etc., on grounds of obscenity, threat to security, etc. —v. 1 act as a censor of. 2 make deletions or changes in. censorial adj. censorship n. [Latin censeo assess]

Usage As a verb, censor is often confused with censure. [POD]

[1] denial n. 1 denying the truth or existence of a thing. 2 refusal of a request or wish. 3 disavowal of a leader etc. [ibid.]

deny v. (-ies, -ied) 1 declare untrue or non-existent. 2 repudiate or disclaim. 3 (often foll. by to) withhold (a thing) from (denied him the satisfaction; denied it to me). deny oneself be abstinent. [Latin: related to *negate] [ibid.]

[2] holocaust n. 1 large-scale destruction, esp. by fire or nuclear war. 2 (the Holocaust) mass murder of the Jews by the Nazis 1939–45. [Greek holos whole, kaustos burnt] [ibid.]

[3] anti-Semite n. person who is prejudiced against Jews. anti-Semitic adj. anti-Semitism n. [ibid.]

[4] Semite n. member of the peoples said to be descended from Shem (Gen. 10), including esp. the Jews and Arabs. [Greek Sem Shem] [ibid.]

[5] Diaspora n. 1 the dispersion of the Jews after their exile in 538 BC. 2 the dispersed Jews. [Greek] [ibid.]

One and only warning(2):

2009-04-17T11:01:00.002+02:00

Anonymous said...

Kathy Farrelly has been dropping t*rds on the doorstep of our blog. We have asked her quite nicely (at first) not to do so, but now we have been forced to turn moderation on. If she comes back, ever, we will spam every blog we know that she has ever contributed to - obviously, including the blog where this message appears as comment, but 10* whatever she drops on us. Sorry - but not too sorry; blame it on Farrelly.
17/4/09 6:47 PM

Anonymous comment to fake élite vs. genuine plebs

2009-04-08T19:16:00.001+02:00

Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "fake élite vs. genuine plebs ...":

The vast majority of website operators don't have the guts to allow this post, anything like it, any searchable lines, or links. They have been deleted more than 90% of the time. The vast majority of syndicated talk radio hosts are screening their calls and won't allow this topic. The vast majority of callers don't have a clue. We are in big trouble. The truth is so Earth shattering, that no public figure has the guts to acknowledge it. Very few have the guts to allow a statement anything like this in their forum. The truth is being suppressed. We are in much more serious trouble than we have been told by any public figure. Don't be fooled by fluctuating economic indicators or short term market stability. The entire foundation of our economy is crumbling. Get ready people. Get your affairs in order. Get your households in order. Get your communities in order. Be prepared. This is no 'correction'. This is no ordinary recession. This won't be just another Great Depression. This will be much worse. Save this post now before it gets deleted.

Sometimes, I wonder why I bother fighting so hard for the little guy. Whats the point if they are too stupid to listen? Say that reminds me.

Amazing. The worst economic and cultural crisis of all time will go down in history horribly misunderstood. What a pathetic bunch of ignorant fools we have become. Consumer junkie credit card morons. Perfect little victims.

Don’t believe one optimistic word from any public figure about the economy or humanity in general. They are part of the problem. Its like a game of Monopoly. In America, the richest 1%, now hold ALMOST 1/2 OF ALL UNITED STATES WEALTH. Unlike ‘lesser’ estimates, this includes all stocks, bonds, cash, offshore accounts, and material assets held by America’s richest 1%. Even that filthy pig Oprah Winfrey acknowledged that it was near 50% in 2006. Naturally, she put her own ‘humanitarian’ spin on it. Calling attention to her own ‘good will’. WHAT A DISGUSTING SELF-CENTERED SELF-PROMOTING HYPOCRITE SLOB. THE RICHEST ONE PERCENT HAVE LITERALLY MADE WORLD PROSPERITY ABSOLUTELY IMPOSSIBLE. Don’t fall for any of their 'good will' ‘humanitarian’ CRAP. ITS A SHAM. THESE PEOPLE ARE CAUSING THE SAME PROBLEMS THEY PRETEND TO CARE ABOUT. THE EQUATION THEY STAND FOR ABSOLUTELY CAN NOT WORK. Ask any professor of economics. Money does not grow on trees. The government can’t just print up more on a whim. There are serious concequences for doing so. Regardless, there is always a relative limit to the wealth within ANY economy of ANY size. So when too much wealth accumulates at the top, the currency looses value, the middle class slip further into debt, and the lower class further into poverty. A similar rule applies worldwide. The world’s richest 1% now own over 40% of ALL WORLD WEALTH. This is EVEN AFTER you account for all of this ‘good will’ ‘humanitarian’ BS from celebrities and executives. ITS A SHAM. As they get richer and richer, less wealth is left circulating beneath them. This is the single greatest underlying cause for the current US recession. The middle class can no longer afford to pay all the bills or sustain their share of the economy. Their wealth has been gradually transfered to the richest 1%. One way or another, we suffer because of their incredible greed. We are talking about TRILLIONS of dollars which have been transfered FROM US TO THEM. All over a period of about 30 years. Thats Reaganomics for you. The wealth does not ‘trickle down’ as we were told it would. It just accumulates at the top. Shrinking the middle class and expanding the lower class. Causing a domino effect of socio-economic problems. But the rich will never stop. They just keep getting richer. Leaving even less of the pie for the other 99% of us to share. At the same time, they throw back a few tax deductible crumbs and call themselves 'heros' or ‘humanitarians’. Cashing in on the PR and getting even richer the following year. IT CAN’T WORK THIS WAY. Their bogus efforts to make the world a better place can not possibly succeed. Any ‘humanitarian’ progress made in one area will be lost in another. EVERY SINGLE TIME. IT ABSOLUTELY CAN NOT WORK THIS WAY. This is going to end very much like a giant game of Monopoly. The current US recession will drag on for years and lead into the worst US depression of all time. The richest 1% will live like royalty while the rest of us fight over jobs, food, and gasoline. So don’t fall for any of this 'good will' 'humanitarian' BS from Hollywood, Pro Sports, and Wall Street PIGS. ITS A SHAM. Remember: They are filthy rich EVEN AFTER their tax deductible contributions. They get richer as we speak. They absolutely will not stop. Greedy pigs. Now, we are headed for the worst economic and cultural crisis of all time. Crime, poverty, and suicide will skyrocket. SEND A “THANK YOU” NOTE TO YOUR FAVORITE MILLIONAIRE. ITS THEIR FAULT. I’m not discounting other factors like China, sub-prime, or gas prices. But all of those factors combined still pale in comparison to that HUGE transfer of wealth from poor to rich. Anyway, those other factors are related and further aggrivated because of GREED. If it weren’t for the OBSCENE distribution of bottom line wealth within our country, there never would have been such a market for sub-prime to begin with. IF IT WEREN’T FOR THE OBSCENE, UNREASONABLE, ILLOGICAL, AND IMMORAL DISTRIBUTION OF UNITED STATES WEALTH, THERE WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN SUCH A MARKET FOR SUB-PRIME AND THERE WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN A COLLAPSE IN THE HOUSING MARKET. Sub-prime did not cause the problem. It only accelerated the outcome. Make no mistake. The housing market would have been in decline by now with or without sub-prime. Which by the way, was another trick whipped up by greedy bankers and executives. IT MADE THEM RICHER. Along with many investors, developers, and public figures. Including three of the most greedy, disgusting, hypocrite pigs that have ever lived. The credit industry has been ENDORSED for years by Oprah Winfrey, Ellen DeGeneres, and Dr Phil. In fact, they specifically endorsed Countrywide by name. IT MADE THEM RICHER. In order to fully appreciate this, you must realize what a rotten trick Countrywide had up their sleeve to begin with. How it was ENDORSED by OPRAH WINFREY, ELLEN DEGENERES, AND DR PHIL. How incredibly irresponsible they were. How they decieved and betrayed their own loyal fans. How they were PAID FOR IT. How they contributed to the artificial rise and accelerated fall of the US housing market. Not only by concentrating so much wealth. Not only by flaunting their own extravogant lifestyles. Not only by promoting this unrealistic concept of 'bigger, better, faster, upscale' EVERYTHING. But also by endorsing sub-prime. How many middle class dreams were shattered because of their GREED. Don't believe what you've heard from them or any other filthy rich public figure. THEY ARE LIARS. It wasn't just about irresponsible lending, borrowing, local banker bonuses, or weak oversight. That was going on BEFORE sub-prime. It was actually much more cruel and calculated. Orchestrated from the top down. 'Predatory lending' is just that. Their plan was to give easy credit to millions while the housing market was still high, inflate the market even higher in the process, reap a few years worth of payments from unsuspecting middle class buyers, allow them to accumulate little or no equity, lie in wait as those homes increased in value, then jack up their rates making it near impossible for those middle class buyers to make the payments on time. At which time, those middle class buyers would be evicted, their dreams shattered, and their homes forfeited. Which by then, until mid '07', would be even higher in value and re-sold for a higher price. The plan was to be executed primarily while the market was strong. Leaving all those previous buyers with NOTHING to show for all those payments made. This incredibly cruel and calculated plan was orchestrated in part by Countrywide. THE SAME COUNTRYWIDE ENDORSED BY OPRAH WINFREY, ELLEN DEGENERES, AND DR PHIL. IT MADE THEM RICHER. It also made many of their loyal fans homeless. What a rotten, disgusting trio of greedy, self-serving, self-promoting, hypocrite pigs. What a rotten, disgusting, immoral way to turn a quick buck. To make as many people as possible love you. Then tell those love-sick people to run out and buy a product or service because you say so. Because you were PAID to endorse it. Without the slightest regard for the downside or anything but your own obscene bottom line. Thats why they did it. GREED. Now, there are similar ties between every major industry, every Fortune 500 company, and nearly every public figure. IT MAKES THEM RICHER. It also drives up the cost and consumption for nearly every product, service, and resource on the market. So don’t fall for their ‘good will’ 'humanitarian' BS. ITS A SHAM. NOTHING BUT A CALCULATED, TAX DEDUCTIBLE, MARKETING PLAN TO RAISE THE VALUE OF THEIR OWN IMAGE. If you fall for it, then you’re a fool. If you see any real difference between the moral character of a celebrity, politician, attorney, lobbyist, executive, or card shark, then you’re a fool. No offense fellow citizens. But we have been mislead by nearly every living public figure. We still are. Even now, they claim to be ‘hurting’ right along with the rest of us. As if gas prices actually effect the lifestyle or bottom line of a millionaire. ITS A LIE. IN 2007, THE RICHEST 1 PERCENT INCREASED THEIR AVERAGE BOTTOM LINE WEALTH AGAIN. Most of these financial assets are on the books. Others hidden. Material assets aren't always disclosed. But make no mistake. America's richest 1 percent keep getting richer. On average, they are now worth almost $5,000,000 each. Thats an all time high. As a group, their net worth is over $20,000,000,000,000. THATS OVER TWENTY TRILLION DOLLARS. Another all time high. Which by the way, is much more than the entire middle and lower classes combined. Also more than enough to pay off our national debt, fund the Iraq war for a decade, repair our infrastructure, and bail out the US housing market. Still think that our biggest problem is China? Think again. Its the one percent club. That means every big name celebrity, athlete, executive, entrepreneur, developer, banker, and lottery winner. Along with many attorneys, doctors, and politicians. If they are rich, then they are part of the problem. Their incredible wealth was not ‘created’, ‘generated’, grown in their back yard, or printed up on their command. The lion's share was transfered FROM US TO THEM. Directly and indirectly. Its become near impossible to spend a dollar without making some greedy pig even richer. Don’t be fooled by the fall of the stock market, industry losses, lower profit margins, bank failures, or the occasional reported loss of a millionaire’s fortune. Overall, they just keep getting richer. They do so with little or no regard for their own industries or the economy as a whole. They are obsessed primarily with a desire to accumulate more personal wealth. They absolutely will not stop. Still, they have the nerve to pretend as if they care about ordinary people. ITS A LIE. NOTHING BUT CALCULATED PR CRAP. WAKE UP PEOPLE. THEIR PRIMARY GOAL IS TO WIN THE GAME. The one percent club will always say or do whatever it takes to get as rich as possible. Without the slightest regard for anything or anyone but themselves. Reaganomics. Their idea. Loans from China. Their idea. NAFTA. Their idea. CAFTA. Their idea. Outsourcing. Their idea. Downsizing. Their idea. Sub-prime. Their idea. High energy prices. Their idea. Oil ‘futures’. Their idea. The commercial lobbyist. Their idea. The multi-million dollar lawsuit. Their idea. The multi-million dollar endorsement deal. Their idea. $400 cell phones. Their idea. $200 cell phone bills. Their idea. $200 basketball shoes. Their idea. $30 late fees. Their idea. $30 NSF fees. Their idea. $20 DVDs. Their idea. $50 event tickets. Their idea. $30 books. Their idea. $400 PC operating systems. Their idea. $60 video games. Their idea. Obscene health care charges. Their idea. Subliminal advertising. Their idea. Commercial brainwash plots on TV. Their idea. Vioxx, and Celebrex. Their idea. Excessive medical testing. Their idea. The MASSIVE campaign to turn every American into a brainwashed, credit card, pharmaceutical, medical testing, love-sick, celebrity junkie. Their idea. IT WAS ALL THEIR IDEA. IT MAKES THEM RICHER. All of the above drive up the cost of living, shrink the middle class, concentrate the world’s wealth and resources, create a domino effect of socio-economic problems, and wreak havok on society. All of which have been CREATED AND ENDORSED by celebrities, athletes, executives, investors, developers, entrepreneurs, attorneys, and politicians. IT MAKES THEM RICHER. So don’t fall for any of their ‘good will’ ‘humanitarian’ BS. ITS A SHAM. NOTHING BUT TAX DEDUCTIBLE PR CRAP. In many cases, the ‘charitable’ contribution is almost entirely offset. Not to mention the opportunity to plug their name, image, product, and ‘good will’ all at once. Which is usually done just before or after the release of their latest commercial project. IT MAKES THEM RICHER. These greedy pigs even have the nerve to throw a fit and spin up a misleading defense with regard to ‘federal tax revenue’. ITS A SHAM. THEY SCREWED UP THE EQUATION TO BEGIN WITH. If the middle and lower classes had a greater share of the economic pie, they could easily cover a greater share of the federal tax revenue. They are held down in many ways because of greed. Wages remain stagnant for the vast majority because the executives, investors, developers, celebrities, athletes, attorneys, politicians, and entrepreneurs, are paid millions. They over-sell, over-charge, under-pay, outsource, lobby, re-locate, cut jobs, and cut benefits to increase or preserve their own obscene personal bottom line. They do so even at the expense of their own industries. Even after you account for the fall of the market and lower industry profit margins, the richest 1 percent still keep getting richer on average. Simply because their wealth is drawn from the majority in many ways. Not necessarily at the same rate, but still in their favor. They continue to reap more than they spend down or 'give back'. They have done so for many years. As more United States wealth rises to the top, the middle and lower classes inevitably suffer. This reduces the potential tax revenue drawn from those brackets. At the same time, it wreaks havok on middle and lower class communities and increases the need for financial aid. Not to mention the spike in crime because of it. There is a domino effect to consider. Caused primarily by a constant transfer of wealth from poor to rich. IT CAN’T WORK THIS WAY. But our leaders refuse to acknowledge this. Instead they come up with one trick after another to milk the system, feed the rich, and screw the majority. These decisions are heavily influensed by the 1% club. Every year, billions of federal tax dollars are diverted behind the scenes back to the rich and their respective industries. Loans from China have been necessary to compensate in part, for the red ink and the multi-trillion dollar transfer of wealth from poor to rich. At the same time, the feds have been pushing more financial burden onto the states who push them lower onto the cities. Again, the hardship is felt more by the majority and less by the 1% club. The rich prefer to live in exclusive areas or upper class communities. They get the best of everything. Reliable city services, new schools, freshly paved roads, new lighting, sidewalks, drainage, upscale parks, ect. The middle and lower class communities get little or nothing without a raise in basic service charges or a local tax increase. Which, they usually can’t afford. So the red ink flows followed by service cuts and lay-offs. All because of the OBSCENE distribution of bottom line wealth in this country. Anyway, when you account for all federal, state, local taxes, and fees, the middle class actually pay about the same rate as the rich. The devil is in the details. So when people forgive the rich for their incredible greed and then praise them for paying a greater share of the FEDERAL income taxes, its like nails on a chalk board. I can not accept any theory that our economy would suffer in any way with a more reasonable distribution of bottom line wealth. Afterall, it was more reasonable 30 years ago. Before Reaganomics came along. Before GREED became such an epidemic. Before we had an army of over-paid executives, investors, celebrities, athletes, attorneys, doctors, entrepreneurs, developers, lobbyists, and sold-out politicians to kiss their greedy asses. As a nation, we were in much better shape. Strong middle class, free and clear assets, home equity, savings, widespread prosperity, stable job market, lower deficit, ect. Our economy as a whole was much more stable and prosperous for the majority. WITHOUT LOANS FROM CHINA. Now, we have a more obscene distribution of bottom line wealth, and resources than ever before. We have a sold-out government, crumbling infrastructure, energy crisis, home forclosure epidemic, credit crunch, weak job market, weak middle class, weak US dollar, 13 figure national debt, and 12 figure annual shortfall. The cost of living is higher than ever before. Most people can’t even afford basic health care. ALL BECAUSE OF GREED. I really don’t blame the upper class in general. At least not as a group and not without exception. No economy could ever function without some reasonable scale of income and wealth. But it can’t be allowed to run wild like a mad dog. ALBERT EINSTEIN TRIED TO MAKE PEOPLE UNDERSTAND. UNBRIDLED CAPITALISM ABSOLUTELY CAN NOT WORK. TOP HEAVY ECONOMIES CAN NOT BE SUSTAINED. THEY ALWAYS COLLAPSE. Bottom line: The richest 1 percent will soon tank the largest economy in the world. It will be catastrophic. Like nothing we’ve ever seen before. The American dream will be shattered. and thats just the beginning. Greed will eventually tank every major economy in the world. Causing millions more to struggle, fight, starve, suffer, and die. Oprah, Angelina, Brad, Bono, and Bill are not part of the solution. They are part of the problem. THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A MULTI-MILLIONAIRE HUMANITARIAN. EXTREME WEALTH MAKES WORLD PROSPERITY ABSOLUTELY IMPOSSIBLE. WITHOUT WORLD PROSPERITY, THERE WILL NEVER BE WORLD PEACE OR ANYTHING EVEN CLOSE. GREED KILLS. IT WILL BE OUR DOWNFALL. Of course, the rich will throw a fit and call me a madman. Of course, they will jump to small minded conclusions about 'jealousy', 'envy', or 'socialism'. Of course, their ignorant fans will do the same. You have to expect that. But I speak the truth. If you don’t believe me, then copy this entry and run it by any professor of economics or socio-economics. Then tell a friend. Call the local radio station. Re-post this entry or put it in your own words. Be one of the first to predict the worst economic and cultural crisis of all time and explain its underlying cause. WE ARE IN BIG TROUBLE.

So what can we do about it? Well, not much. Unfortunately, we are stuck on a runaway train. The problem has gone unchecked for too many years. The US/global depression is comming thanks to the 1% club. It would take a massive effort by the vast majority to prevent it. Along with a voluntary sacrifice by the rich. THATS NOT GOING TO HAPPEN. But if you believe in miracles, then spend your money as wisely as possible. Especially in middle and lower class communities. Check the Fortune 500 list and limit your support of high profit/low labor industries (Hollywood, pro sports, energy, credit, pharmaceutical, cable, satelite, internet advertising, video, and music, cell phone, high fashion, jewelry, ect.). Cancel all but one credit card for emergencies only. Call the provider and demand a lower rate. Be persistent. You may get it. (By the way. I gave this piece of advice long before NBC. I'm not looking for kudos. I'm telling you that NBC is directly affiliated with the credit industry. They could have given you this piece of advice years ago. Instead, they stood by and allowed their parent company, sister companies, and network sponsors to RIP YOU OFF. Even now, they give the occasional 'good guy' financial advice only because they are pressured to do so. They carefully balance every piece of 'good guy' advice with their primary goal to GET YOUR MONEY. Which is why their 'good guy' advice is so often followed by a plug for one of their sister companies, sister channels, network sponsors, or coorporate partners. For example: They tell you to pay down your credit card debt. Good advice. They should have given it years ago. Then, they tell you to GET MORE CREDIT CARDS and use them. Bad advice. One week Jean Chatzky tells you to avoid the 'free credit report' scam because it is always followed by a monthly service charge. Good advice. They should have given it years ago. The following week she stands by as her paid fellow advisor strongly implies for you to have your credit monitered on a monthly basis and praises a caller for doing so. Bad advice. This is actually a plug for one of their network sponsors, coorporate partners, or parent company. The praise is nothing but a psychological trick. DON'T FALL FOR IT. Don't take ANYTHING they say at face value. Instead, read between the lines. Carefully weigh every piece of 'good guy' advice given against their primary goal. THEY WANT YOUR MONEY.). If you need a cell phone, then do your homework and find the best deal on a local pre-pay. You may be able to get one for as little as $10 a month. Don't text. The charge may seem low at the time but their profit margins are obscene. If you want home internet access, then check for a locally based provider. They can be found in nearly every city nationwide. Otherwise, use the least expensive big name provider, and share accounts whenever possible. If you need to search, then use the less popular search engines. They usually produce about same results anyway. Don't pay for any internet download. Their profit margins for such data transfers are obscene. Don’t pay to see any blockbuster movie. Instead, wait a few months and rent the DVD from a local store, borrow it, or buy it USED. Then loan it to a friend or family member. If you prefer the outing, then choose a film produced by the lesser known studeos with lower paid actors. If you want to see a big name game or event, then watch it in a local bar, club, or at home on network TV. Don’t buy any high end official merchandise and don’t support the high end sponsors. If its endorsed by a big name celebrity, then don’t buy it. If you can afford a new car, then make an exception for GM, Ford, and Dodge. If they don’t increase their market share soon, then a lot more people are going to get screwed out of their pensions and/or benefits. Of course, you must know by now to avoid those big trucks and SUVs unless you truly need one for its utility. Don’t be ashamed to buy a foreign car if you prefer it. Afterall, those with the most fuel efficient vehicles consume a lot less foreign oil. Which accounts for a pretty big chunk of our trade deficit. Its a reasonable trade-off. Anyway, the global economy is worth supporting to some extent. Its the obscene profit margins, trade deficits, and BS from OPEC that get us into trouble. Otherwise, the global economy would be a good thing for everyone. Just keep in mind that the big 3 are struggling and they do produce a few smaller reliable cars. Don’t frequent any high end department store or any business in a newly developed center or upper class community. By doing so, you encourage greedy developers, make them richer, and draw vital support away from industrial areas and away from the middle and lower class communities. Instead, support the local retailer and the less popular shopping centers. Especially in lower or middle class communities. If you can afford to buy a home, then do so. But go smaller and less expensive. Don’t get yourself in too deep and don’t buy into the newly developed condos or gated communities. Instead, find a modest home in a building or neighborhood at least 20 years old. If you live in one of the poorer states, then try to support its economy first and foremost. Be on the lookout for commercial brainwash plots on TV. They are written into nearly every scene of nearly every show. Most cater to network sponsors, coorporate partners, and parent companies. Especially commercial health care. In particular, high profit pharmaceuticals and excessive medical testing. These plugs are countless, calculated, and VERY well written. They have brainwashing down to a science. DON'T FALL FOR IT. Get off the couch and take care of your body the way nature intended. There is no substitute. If you must see a doctor, then DEMAND that he/she give you more than 5 minutes of their undivided attention. Otherwise, dispute their unreasonable charges. Be prepared with written questions about your condition and get them answered one at a time. If they refuse, then dispute their unreasonable charges. If they prescribe excessive medical testing then ask if they personally own the equipment or if they are paid a commission for each test. If they find nothing new or signifigant, then dispute their unreasonable charges. If they prescribe a pharmaceutical, then ask for a generic. Better yet, concider a change in lifestyle or simple tolerance. If they still recommend the name brand pharmaceutical, then ask about any financial ties or conflict of interest. If they get offended, then dispute their unreasonable charges and consider a new doctor. If you must drug away your sniffles, worries, jitters, aches, and pains, then at least do your homework. Be aware of the possible side-effects ahead of time. Don't be surprised to find yourself back a week or two later feeling worse. In which case, you should dispute their unreasonable charges. If you are diagnosed with another medical condition, then ask your doctor what he/she has done to rule out those possible side-effects. Otherwise, dispute their unreasonable charges. Don't let any greedy doctor treat you like a number, make you wait an hour, or rush you out of their office. Otherwise, dispute their unreasonable charges. Don't fall for this CRAP that doctors have no choice but to over-book their time or over-charge their patients because of high overhead. ITS A LIE. YOUR DOCTOR IS MOST LIKELY A MULTI-MILLIONAIRE. So don't fall for their CRAP. Demand their undivided attention and respect. Afterall, they took an oath. If you have the opportunity before being admitted, then check the record of your hospital. Check to see if they have been investigated or sued for providing unnecessary treatment, excessive medical testing, or fraudulent billing. Dozens have already been caught doing so. Do all of the above regardless of your coverage. Don't force your employer to cover the obscene and often fraudulent charges of a corrupt health care industry. By doing so, you make the problem worse. Keep your guard up when watching ANY talk show. These people are not your friends. They are not your advocates. They are paid actors hired to get your attention and your money. Some of them are also executive producers (Oprah Winfrey, Ellen Degeneres, and Dr Phil.). Nearly every word, smile, and stupid joke is rehearsed ahead of time. Including those which take place so often during what appear to be 'technical oversights' (Today Show. Even their stage hands are mixed in behind the scenes so that you can hear them laugh at every stupid joke.). Its all fake. Its all calculated. These people are not trying to make the world a happy place. They are trying to entertain you only because their marketing studies have shown that you are more likely to drop your guard and support their sponsors. Nearly every segment is about marketing some over-priced product or service. They will use any excuse to plug a gadget, fashion item, travel destonation, university, drug, medical test, surgical procedure, movie, TV show, book, magazine, song, website, ect. Almost all of it over-priced. Almost all of it resulting in higher profits for their sponsors, partners, and parent companies. DON'T FALL FOR IT. Big business is fine on occasion depending on their product, ethics, employment, profit margins, and profit sharing. Do your homework. If they are screwing up our economy or society, then don't pay them for it. If you want to support any legitimate charity, then do so directly. Never support any celebrity foundation. Don't be fooled by the sale of baby photos, lies about percentage of income donated, or praise from other well known public figures. Celebrity foundations are CRAP. They spend most of their funding on PR campaigns, exotic travel, and super high end accomodations for themselves. Thats right. Filthy rich public figures have been jet-setting the world in the name of 'humanity' for years. Riding in personal jets, staying in super-exclusive resorts, and living it up in exotic locations around the world the likes of which most people could never afford even if their lives depended on it. They bring along agents, advisors, publicists, hair, make-up, wardrobe, lighting, and photo crews who are also in it for themselves. They are paid six or seven figures for their part to schedule, manage, document, showcase, praise, and publicize the 'good will' of said public figures and their respective industries. Every possible expense is passed of as 'incidental' or 'necessary' and billed right back to some 'foundation' named after said public figure and/or respective industry. Every possible tax deduction is claimed. Which are incredibly vague and diverse thanks to our sold-out government. Deals are cut with major networks who agree to praise the 'good will' or 'humanitarian' effort of said public figures and plug their latest commercial project around the same time. Others from around the world pick up the story and save these industries billions in advertising every year. Resulting in higher profits and paychecks for the 1% club. When its all said and done more wealth is transfered from poor to rich. NOT the other way around. So don't support any charity named after a living celebrity. Don't be fooled or inspired by any photo you see in a magazine, any clip on TV, any affiliation, or any short term short sighted progress report. Instead, go to Charitywatch.org and look up a top rated charity to support your favorite cause. Its all there. For example: 'Habitat For Humanity' is a top rated charity. They have been for many years. They operate with a low overhead, volunteer workforce, and donated materials. They have built homes for the less fortunate in nearly every city nationwide. Including New Orleans. They do so as we speak. No similar effort can match their progress hour for hour or dollar for dollar. So there is no legitimate reason to support a slower, less efficient effort represented by a filthy rich Hollywood actor who flies in on a personal jet, takes most of the credit, and makes a deal with a major network for plugs just days before the premier of his latest film or DVD release. By doing so, you support not only the inefficient effort, but also the filthy rich actor. Concentrating more wealth and dumbing down our society further in the process. Instead, support 'Habitat For Humanity'. Its not perfect. It is affiliated with some big business. However, it is MUCH more efficient, effective, and less corrupt than 'Make It Right'. The difference is profound. In general, support the little guy as much as possible and the big guy as little as possible. Keep your own greed in check. Don't play the big stakes lottery games, and don't invest only for profit. Don't believe for a second that you can get rich and still manage to keep your soul because you can't. Don't believe for a second that you can concentrate even more of the world's wealth and somehow 'give back' enough to make up for it because you can't. If you do come into a fortune, then give away the bulk of it to a legitimate cause or directly to others who have far less. Do it quickly before that big money turns your heart black. Find the courage and do it. STAY OUT OF THE 1% CLUB. Encourage others to do the same. Their standard is obscene, unjust, illogical, and immoral. There is no excuse for it. Do your part to reverse the transfer of wealth away from the rich and back to the middle and lower classes. Otherwise, there will be no economic recovery EVER. Unfortunately, there is no perfect answer. Jobs will be lost either way. Families will go cold and hungry either way. Innocent children will starve and die either way. But we need to support the largest group of workers with the most reasonable profit margins. We need to stand for a more reasonable distribution of income, bottom line wealth, and resources. We need to support LEGITIMATE charities (Check that list at Charitywatch.org). This is our only chance to limit the severity or duration of the comming US/global depression. In the meantime, don’t listen to Bernanke, Paulson, Bartiromo, Orman, Dobbs, Kramer, Pickens, Larson, O'Reiley, Limbaugh, Bruce, Ingraham, or any other public figure with regard to the economy. They are all plenty smart but I swear to you that they will lie right through their rotten teeth. IT MAKES THEM RICHER. These people work for big business. They are sponsored by big business. The ‘experts’ they cite also work for big business. They invest in big business. They are all motivated primarily by their obsessive desire to accumulate even more personal wealth. THEY WILL LIE RIGHT THROUGH THEIR ROTTEN TEETH. So don’t fall for their tricks. Instead, look at the big picture. The economic problems we face have been mounting for well over 20 years. All of them caused or aggrivated by a constant transfer of wealth from poor to rich. Soon, it will cause the worst ever GLOBAL DEPRESSION. Its not brain surgery. For the mostpart, Its simple math. Like I said, you are welcome to copy this entry and run it by any professor of economics or socio-economics. Go ahead and do it. Ask them specifically about the link between the distribution of wealth and economic stability. If thats not good enough, then look up what Albert Einstein had to say about greed, excess, extreme wealth, and its horrible economic and cultural concequences. Then call any syndicated talk radio show. Tell the screeners that you would like to discuss the concentration of wealth. Mention the views of Albert Einstein with regard to this issue. Your call will be refused. FLAT OUT REFUSED. The vast majority screen their calls and won't allow this topic. Try any local talk radio show. You will face massive opposition there as well but at least they will take your call. Be prepared. These people are very good debators. The vast majority are die-hard capitalists. If they take offense, they may insult you, talk over you, try to re-define your own statements, or call you a 'socialist', 'marxist', or 'communist'. They often use these words to refer to anyone who points out the flaws of unbridled capitalism. They may follow with the old "socialism/marxism doesn't work" line. Maybe, they should take a closer look at whats happening in the world and see that unbridled capitalism doesn't work either. The heavy concentration of wealth is it's fatal flaw. We need a compromise. A relatively free market system with a minimum wage, a maximum wage, a progressive tax policy, and caps on personal wealth. Any little step in that direction would be a start. If you get the opportunity, then confront any politician or public figure in any forum. Ask them to confirm or deny the concentration of wealth and the relation if any to economic stability. Watch them squirm. They will not give you a straight answer because most public figures are filthy rich. They simply will not acknowledge the ugly truth. GREED KILLS. IT WILL BE OUR DOWNFALL.

Its already underway. A massive campaign to divert our attention. Trump, Buffet, O'Reiley, Dobbs, Winfrey, Pickens, Larson, Norris, Branson, Bohannon, Limbaugh, Coulter, Clinton, Hannity, Ingraham, Bruce, Bloomberg, Doyle, and several other well known filthy rich public figures have been running their mouths about the economy. Finally admitting a hint of severity after years of denial. They even have the nerve to FINALLY acknowledge the possibility of a US/global depression. Still, they refuse to acknowledge the single greatest underlying cause. GREED. Instead, they focus on policies, procedures, and circumstances that were born FROM the underlying cause. GREED. They ramble on about 'sub-prime', 'toxic debt', 'junk bonds', and 'risky investments'. As if somehow all of this could have been avoided if those transactions had never taken place to begin with. What a joke. Those factors don't represent the underlying cause of this global economic crisis. They represent the effect of a shrinking middle class and massive consumer debt. CAUSED BY GREED. A MASSIVE TRANSFER OF WEALTH FROM POOR TO RICH. Otherwise, there wouldn't have been such a market for sub-prime to begin with. The debt wouldn't have been 'toxic'. The bonds wouldn't have been 'junk'. The investments wouldn't have been so 'risky'. By focusing on such factors, they attempt to divert our attention, limit our hindsight, disregard the OBSCENE concentration of wealth and capital, that shrinking middle class, the high cost of living, and the particular form of evil responsible for almost all of it. GREED. Dancing their way around the big picture. DON'T FALL FOR IT. Remember: Our national debt was way up BEFORE sub-prime. Consumer debt was way up BEFORE sub-prime. The cost of living was up BEFORE sub-prime. Wall Street profits were obscene BEFORE sub-prime. The middle class were loosing free and clear assets BEFORE sub-prime. Our infrastructure was in bad shape BEFORE sub-prime. Loans from China were taken out BEFORE sub-prime. The dollar was loosing value BEFORE sub-prime. All of this took place over a period of many years under both Republican and Democratic rule. All of it coincided with a transfer of wealth from poor to rich. So don’t let these cowardly, hypocritical, sold-out, partisan, filthy rich public figures divert your attention or limit your range of thought. THE CURRENT GLOBAL ECONOMIC CRISIS WAS NOT CAUSED BY A SINGLE POLICY, PROCEDURE, POLITICAL PARTY, OR ADMINISTRATION. IT WAS CAUSED PRIMARILY BY A MASSIVE TRANSFER OF WEALTH FROM POOR TO RICH. THIS ALSO REPRESENTS A MASSIVE CONCENTRATION OF CAPITAL WORLDWIDE. OTHERWISE, THERE WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN SUCH A MARKET FOR SUB-PRIME AND THERE WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN A GLOBAL CREDIT CRUNCH. MONEY DOES NOT GROW ON TREES AND IT DOES NOT JUST FLOAT AWAY. IT ONLY TRANSFERS FROM ONE PARTY TO ANOTHER. ALBERT EINSTEIN TRIED TO MAKE PEOPLE UNDERSTAND. GREED KILLS. IT WILL BE OUR DOWNFALL.

A word for those who respond with the usual ‘I know more than you. I spell better than you. I talk like an economist. Look how smart, knowledgable, and articulate I am’ crap. Let me say this in advance. I don’t claim to be an expert in this field. I never will be. I'm still learning and I don't claim to be infallible. But I did go on record with these predictions long before any public figure uttered the word ‘recession’. I've done so 'on the air' and 'online'. Millions of you already know my voice from various local talk radio shows in several states and one syndicated. My first call was in September of '05'. I tried to explain that we will never have world peace without world prosperity and that we will never have world prosperity without a 'fair and reasonable pay-scale'. I also tried to explain the link between 'extreme wealth' and 'extreme poverty'. My call was immediately followed by attacks from so called 'patriots' who felt that my cause must have been to promote 'socialism' or 'bring down America'. Not warn her citizens. You may also remember me from various chat rooms criticizing the 1% club and Hollywood humanitarians in particular. If you search long enough, you will find my early postings online from ‘05' and ‘06'. At first, they were written specifically to fit within a few hundred characters. Including the first draft of this rant. It started with one short paragraph predicting a 'total collapse of the US economy'. Others included phrases like 'game of Monopoly', 'recession is inevitable', 'global recession', 'greed kills', and 'the worst economic and cultural crisis of all time'. Some of which were eventually included here. From day 1, I have tried to explain the link between extreme wealth, poverty, and economic instability. My internet account was eventually cancelled for posting 'spam' in response to articles about the economy. In December of '06', I predicted market instability by spring of the following year. I did so 'on the air'. In January of '07', I called another morning talk radio show and spoke with a guest host who was filling in for a well known public figure. Again, I specifically predicted growing market instability, the current US recession, and the subsequent US/global depression.Which by the way, will be the worst of all time by far. In February of '07', Allen Greenspan acknowledged a 'one in three' chance of a US recession. I immediately called another talk radio show and guranteed AGAIN that it was iminent. I criticized Greenspan and tried to explain that it was not about 'odds' but instead a very simple equation with regard to distribution of income and wealth. I also gave credit to Albert Einstein who went on record with similar views in 1949. As far as I know, he was the first to do so. By late spring of '07', the market was rattled and the economic 'stimulus' in the works. Which turned out to be around $160,000,000,000. THATS ONE HUNDRED AND SIXTY BILLION DOLLARS. Well over 1% of our GDP. Deemed appropriate at the time by our leaders. In fact, Bush went on record with a claim that it was based on a mathematical formula and proven strategy. They said it would work. I immediately predicted that it would have little or no effect. By summer of '07' the stock market was more unstable. The housing market in decline. Again, I predicted that it would get MUCH worse. In September of '07', I predicted that our government would have no choice but to acknowledge a US recession by October of '08'. I also assured the audiance that our economy would "go down in a ball of flames" because of greed and that no recovery would EVER take place without a more reasonable distribution of wealth and resources. I have made these predictions 'on air' and 'online' literally hundreds of times. The first call was in September of '05'. Made to a well known public figure with a large audiance. The first blog post a month or so later. Prior to that, I had never even seen one. In fact, my very first post to a blog was written specifically to warn my fellow citizens about the comming US/global depression. Which I was already convinced at the time would be SEVERE within a decade. That was in October of '05'. At the time, there were literally only a few of us worldwide posting any such prediction online. I'm talking maybe a dozen searchable links. This particular rant began with one short paragraph in '06'. Like the others, it was originally intended to fit within a few hundred characters. At the time, I was unaware of any blogs which allowed for longer entries to be posted anonymously. This paragraph was first written in early-mid '08'. Its been updated several times. There has also been a running debate on iVillage.com which began in October of '07' (don't click on their ads). In February or March of '08', I refered specifically to the bank failures of the Great Depression and predicted that it was about to happen again. At the time, I was one of only a few bloggers worldwide to go on record with any such prediction. This was still several weeks to months before Greenspan, Paulson, Bartiromo, Orman, Kramer, O'Reiley, Larson, Bohannon, Dobbs, Celeste or any other well known public figure had acknowledged even a hint of severity. It was also several weeks before Fanny May and Freddie Mac made the news. I also predicted in March that our markets would end the year much lower than they began. Which was still contrary to what we were being told by any public figure. I was allowed to post but when my predictions came true, the site operators went back all the way to October of '07' and deleted nearly every one of my previous entries (they missed a few.). Their motive was obvious. They wanted to 'erase' my credibility. IVillage.com is directly affiliated with NBC, GE, Universal Studeos, Countrywide, CityBank, Capital One, Oprah Winfrey, Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt, Ellen Degeneres, Dr Phil, and others who I persecute by name. All of which depend on the constant dumbing down of society. All of whom are partially responsible for the current economic crisis. None of which or whom have the GUTS to acknowledge the single greatest underlying cause. GREED. In fact, those who epitomoze it (all of the above) want my big mouth SHUT. For 3 solid years, I have been ripping on the 1% club for their incredible greed and hypocrisy. From day 1, my call has been for a more reasonable distribution of income, wealth, and resources. My warning that without it, we would face the worst economic and cultural crisis of all time. Since then, I’ve gone on record against people like Greenspan, Bernanke, Paulson, Laffer, O'Reiley, Bartiromo, Orman, Kramer, Larson, and Dobbs. So far, my predictions have been accurate. The public figures DEAD WRONG. Afterall, not one of them acknowledged even a hint of severity in '05', '06', or '07'. When they FINALLY did this year, they all said something to the effect of "None of us saw this comming.". LIARS. There were a few of us typing our fingers to the bone trying to warn people. There were a few of us calling talk radio shows almost daily trying to warn people. I was one of them. Again, I don't claim to be an expert in this field. But I do understand simple equations, basic economics, and cultural trends. I also realize that mainstream views are DEAD WRONG and based on LIES told by filthy rich public figures who will say whatever it takes to serve their own interests. GREED. Afterall, what kind of incredible MORON could even glance at the numbers and somehow think the equation could work? What kind of incredible MORON could possibly hope to sustain an economy based on a constant transfer of wealth from poor to rich? What the hell did they expect to happen when the middle class finally ran low on money to spend on over-priced crap like everything that I mentioned in that first long paragraph? What the hell were they thinking of? I'll tell you what. RICHES. FILTHY STINKING RICHES. Thats what. Now, they are spinning themselves dizzy trying to divert our attention. Mark my words: They will never acknowledge the obscene concentration of wealth or the negative effect had on economic stability. They will never acknowledge the downside of their own incredible greed. They will all come up with one campaign or strategy after another to blame the other guy, the other administration, the other politician, the other party, the other policy, the other industry, the other country, ect. Whatever it takes to dumb down our society. They will NEVER have the GUTS to acknowledge the single greatest underlying cause for this global economic crisis. GREED. They won't even have the guts to acknowledge the views or predictions of Albert Einstein made way back in 1949. THOSE PARTICULAR VIEWS AND PREDICTIONS. Instead, they will produce their own big money/big business/big celebrity 'experts' who have the same motive to lie right through their rotten teeth. GREED. Its not their knowledge I question. Its their character. GREED. Like I said. This is not brain surgery. For the mostpart, its simple math. When you concentrate the world’s wealth, you also concentrate its capital, and shrink the middle class along with the potential market for every major industry. Homes go unsold. Bills go unpaid. Jobs are lost. Banks fail. More products go unsold. More jobs are lost. More banks fail. and so on. and so on. and so on. It happened 80 years ago in that order beginning with a concentration of wealth. It will happen again. This time on a catastrophic global scale. Throughout the cycle, the rich will panic and tighten their grip. Concentrating the world’s wealth and resources even further, getting richer in the process, and ensuring the collapse of every major economy worldwide. Think it can’t happen? Think again. GREED KILLS. IT WILL BE OUR DOWNFALL.

Another thing. I don’t want credit for any of this. Otherwise, I would have given my full name a long time ago. I havn't. IT DOESN'T MATTER. I'm not selling a book and I'm not looking for any notoriety. At least not yet. I do have a plan to go public when my parents die. In fact, I have BIG plans for my inheritence. Every single penny of it. In the meantime, I don't want them to know about it. I also don't want them punished for my big mouth. Which is why I've gone out of my way to remain anonymous for 3 solid years. When I do go public, it won't be for profit and it won't be for popularity. It will be for a legitimate cause and NOTHING ELSE. In fact, I hope to be just one of many. A face in the crowd. In the meantime, I don't care who gets to say "I told you so." IT DOESN'T MATTER. As far as I’m concerned, you can put this entire rant in your own words and take credit for all of it. I don’t care. Just spread the word. Otherwise, the greatest injustice of all time will go down in history unchecked.

By the way. The bailout won’t work. IT WON’T WORK. The plan fails to address the fundamental problem. The middle class don’t need more credit. They need a reasonable share of the economic pie. They also need a lower cost of living and a chance to catch their breath. They need a break from all of the psychological marketing tricks and mass market BS. Most of all, they need to wake up, see the truth, and take a stand. GREED KILLS. IT WILL BE OUR DOWNFALL.

10.01.08
To my surprise, two public figures have found the courage to acknowledge this problem to some degree. On 11.07.07 former presidential candidate Ron Paul mentioned the massive transfer of wealth from poor to rich. He also hinted at the possibility of economic collapse. He did so on 'Face the Nation'. He was blacklisted almost immediately for doing so. On 9.28.08 former secretary of labor Robert Reich refered to the obscene levels of income inequality as part of a "recipe for disaster". He mentioned the richest one percent in particular. He did so on 'Late Night With Conan O'Brien'. As far as I know, Albert Einstein was the first to explain the link between extreme wealth and economic instability. He did so in 1949. He explained how the first Great Depression was actually caused by a massive transfer of wealth from poor to rich. He predicted that it would happen again. He also predicted much greater levels of economic instability proportional to much greater levels of income and wealth inequality. He was right. Amazing. The prosperity of an entire world is about to be compromised. Almost entirely because of greed. IT WILL BE OUR DOWNFALL.

Another word about the first Great Depression. It really was a perfect storm. Caused almost entirely by greed. First, there was unprecedented economic growth. There was a massive building spree. There was a growing sense of optimism. There was a growing obsession for celebrities. The American people became spoiled, foolish, brainwashed, and love-sick. They were bombarded with ads for one product or service after another. Encouraged to spend all of their money as if it were going out of style. Obscene profits were hoarded at the top. All of this represented a MASSIVE transfer of wealth from poor to rich. Executives, entrepreneurs, celebrities, and share holders. By 1929, the wealthiest 1 percent had accumulated around 40% of all United States wealth. The upper class held around 30%. The middle and lower classes were left to share the rest. When they finally ran low on money to spend, profits declined and the stock market crashed. Of course, the rich threw a fit and started cutting jobs. They would stop at nothing to maintain their disgusting profit margins and ill-gotten obscene levels of wealth as long as possible. The small business owners did what they felt necessary to survive. They cut more jobs. The losses were felt primarily by the little guy. This created a domino effect. The middle class shrunk drastically and the lower class expanded. With less wealth in active circulation, banks failed by the hundreds. More jobs were cut. Unemployment reached 25% in 1933. The worst year of the Great Depression. Those who were employed had to settle for lower wages. Millions went cold and hungry. The recovery involved a World War and higher taxes on the rich. With so many men in the service, so many women on the production line, and those higher taxes to help pay for it, the lions share of United States wealth was gradually transfered back to the middle class. This redistribution of wealth continued until the mid seventies. At the time, the richest 1% reaped about 10% of all private income and held about 20% of all United States wealth. Far less than previous levels. The middle class had home equity, free and clear assets, and money in the bank. Most American households were secure with a single full time provider. Most retirees could enjoy their lives, live in their own homes, afford basic health care, and not have to worry about going bankrupt. THATS THE WAY IT SHOULD BE. The tide began to change in 1976. Jimmy Carter was blamed for a recession that was actually caused by a number of global circumstances including greed. Then a short sighted greedy little pig by the name of Arthur Laffer came along. Known for his famous 'Laffer Curve'. A simple and short sighted equation whipped up to increase tax revenues and profit margins without the slightest regard for ANYTHING ELSE. He convinced Ronald Reagan to campaign on and grant massive tax breaks to the rich and their respective industries. His half-baked theory was that by doing so, unprecidented levels of economic growth and revenue could be achieved. He was right. Unfortunately, he failed to see or acknowledge the big picture. He failed to understand or admit what should have been incredibly obvious after the first Great Depression. That 'economic growth' and 'actual prosperity' are two very different things. Jobs don't 'create' wealth. They only transfer it from one party to another. The devil is in the details. Reaganomics, gave the rich and their respective industries the incentive to 'expand' and 'create jobs'. But those products and services were over-priced and then sold or billed right back to the people. Often, without their knowledge, understanding, or consent. Certainly without a clue about how the economy REALLY works. All of this resulted in higher profits for those at the top and stagnant wages for almost everyone else. The cost of living went up right along with those obscene profit margins. The American people ended up working more hours just to maintain their standard of living. So with Reaganomics, the transfer of wealth from poor to rich was kicked back into high gear. Here we are 27 years later. Trillions in wealth and capital have been concentrated all over again. National and consumer debt are both at an all time high. The middle class are weak, the lower class flat broke, and the cost of living higher than ever before. The dollar is weak because too many of them have been hoarded and the government left with no choice but to print billions more backed up by loans from China. Its another perfect storm. THE BIG ONE. The largest economy in the world is about to go down in a ball of flames. Ground zero of a global economic crisis. CAUSED ALMOST ENTIRELY BY GREED. A MASSIVE TRANSFER OF WEALTH FROM POOR TO RICH. As a nation, we don't even see it because our entire culture has been defined by Washington, Wall Street, Hollywood, Pro-sports, and commercial health care. We have been led around like puppies by those with the worst possible motive. GREED. THEY WANT OUR MONEY. For the mostpart, we just bend over and let them take it. We have become their perfect little victims once again. A nation of consumer junkie, credit card, couch potatoe, drug and doctor morons. We spend most of our spare time on that couch getting brainwashed by greedy public figures who will say or do whatever it takes to get our money. Even worse, those public figures have re-defined any logical standard we ever had for 'good will'. Mother Teresa is dead. America's favorite 'humanitarian' is now a filthy rich multi-media pig who reaped a billion dollar fortune from the middle class by making damn sure they stay on that couch long enough to watch her show and read her magazine. Transforming them into pathetic, naive, love-sick fools who turn around and buy any product or service given away to a cheering studeo audiance or endorsed by their idol. The same goes for Ellen Degeneres, Dr Phil, Regis and Kelly, Rachael Ray, The View, and their respective demographics. Which by the way, are almost identical. Primarily, middle class housewives, retirees, and welfare mothers. Who have been shown through marketing research to spend most of their money and food stamps on over-priced CRAP advertised on TV or a TV show website (ivillage.com). Especially if that over-priced crap is endorsed by a 'hero' or 'humanitarian'. They are easy targets. Not like the rest of us are much less gullible. We're not. In fact, every filthy rich well known public figure and every major industry have followed suit with a similar marketing strategy. Dumbing down our society and cashing in on bogus promises to make the world a better place. They do it because they know it works. They also know that we are too stupid, short sighted, smitten, and love-sick to take a closer look at the world and see that they are wolves in sheep's clothing. To see that what they are doing is FALSE. For example: In the fall of '01', Jennifer Lopez was invited to take part in a music video for charity. The effort was hailed as a benefit for victims of AIDS and 9/11. Well, Jennifer Lopez doesn't do ANYTHING for free. She DEMANDED AND RECIEVED the following for her exclusive use: A 45 foot trailer with a TV, VCR, stereo, an assortment of CDs, a white dressing room with lavish all white decor, all white furniture, and an assortment of exotic fruits and desserts. All of this was necessary just to get her sorry ass in the studeo for 30 minutes. FOR CHARITY. Of course, the organizers are partly to blame for selling out to a 'diva'. In fact, I have my doubts about the entire project. Charity just isn't what it used to be. Most of it has gone commercial. SOLD OUT. Even the UN has become a PR firm for Hollywood and Pro-Sports. Going so far as to allow George Clooney access to the UN headquarters auditorium with his own camera crew. A F$#@$&% CELEBRITY. Of course, that footage was plastered all over the media weeks later right along with plugs for his latest Hollywood blockbuster. Like I said, the UN has become a PR firm. Most of their 'good will ambassadors' are filthy rich, hypocrite pigs who dumb down their ignorant fans, take as much of their money as possible, buy up mass acreage and multiple mansions, flaunt their extravogant lifestyles, jet-set the world, burn through limited life sustaining resources like there is no tomorrow, drive up the cost of living worldwide, and then run their mouths about 'poverty' or some other 'injustice' everytime their latest commercial project hits the market. They do it for publicity. They even have the nerve to run their mouths about 'global warming', 'conservation', and 'green' living. As if the example they set is anything but obscene. As if a roll of eco-friendly toilet paper somehow offsets the clear cutting of a dozen acres to build another F%$#$@# CELEBRITY MANSION. Of course, they have NOTHING to say about greed or economic injustice. NOTHING to say about the concentration of wealth and resources worldwide. NOT A SINGLE F%$#@#$ WORD. What a bunch of false heroes. These people have no real desire to make the world a better place. Their primary goal is to APPEAR as if they do. IT MAKES THEM RICHER. It also gives them a lame excuse to be such greedy, rank, filthy, disgusting, slobbering, squandering, hypocrite pigs. Amazing. EVERY big business, EVERY big celebrity, EVERY billionaire, and damn near every multi-millionaire on the planet have all taken up 'philanthropy' or 'good will'. Those with the most money, also have the most power, and influense by far. They own or influense every government, manage every major industry, and the lion's share of life sustaining resources. They literally rule our world. They always have. Still, every major problem of modern society gets worse by the day. The world's wealth is more concentrated than ever before. Her life sustaining resources are in high demand, more expensive than ever before, and squandered by the rich on extravogant living. Meanwhile, families loose their homes, retirees loose their pensions, heroes loose their lives, crime is up, and red ink flows in nearly every community nationwide. The global economy is in a state of crisis. The prosperity of an entire world is about to be compromised. Still, those with the most power, money, influense, and 'good will' promise to make it all better. If only we continue to buy any product or service with their name on it. IT IS A SHAM. GOOD WILL HAS BECOME BIG BUSINESS.

The rich and famous do not want to be seen as 'pigs' or go down in history as 'villains'. They want to be seen as 'heros' and go down in history as 'humanitarians'. The market for their product has become global. The fan base has become global. Therefore, the 'humanitarian' effort and 'good will' PR machine has gone global. These 'humanitarian' efforts and 'good deeds' are not chosen to address the greatest need or injustice. They are chosen almost exclusively to appeal to the largest demographic for their respective commercial products. The largest fan base. Efficiency or effect is of little or no concern. Its all about PR, marketing, image, and fame. This is why so many of the rich and famous have taken up 'philanthropy' or 'good will' around the world. This is why so many have 'schools' or 'foundations' in their name. This is why so many play golf or appear on a TV game show for 'charity'. This is why so many sign motorcycles, other merchandise, or auction off their own 'personal effects' for 'charity'. This is why so many have TV shows with a 'charitable' gimmick. This is why so many arrange photo ops with wounded veterans, firefighters, or sick children. This is why so many have adopted children from around the world (Which they always pay others to care for full time. The hired professionals are sworn by legal contract to confidentiality. Not allowed to discuss or appear in public with the children they care for. Those 'photo' and 'interview' opportunities are reserved exclusively for the rich and famous 'adoptive' parents.). Its all about marketing, image, and fame. This is why we are so often reminded of their respective 'good deeds' or 'humanitarian' efforts shortly before or after the release of their latest commercial product. IT IS A SHAM. THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A MULTI-MILLIONAIRE HUMANITARIAN. GOOD WILL HAS BECOME BIG BUSINESS.

The point about our government printing up more money was that it can't be done "on a whim" and that there are serious concequences for doing so (weak dollar, higher gas prices, inflation). I never said that it can't be or hasn't been done at all. Afterall, those loans from China weren't infused in the form of Chinese currency. They were infused in the form of our own. Not given to the middle or lower classes but instead to the banks in the form of credit. Its done nothing but perpetuate the problem. It never has been and never will be the answer. Sorry if I wasn't explicit enough the first time. The original draft of this particular rant was written over 2 years ago and intended to fit within 300 characters. I've been updating it weekly for the last year or so. Responding to a constant line of BS from the media and inserting those updates where they seem most appropriate. Which is why I jump so often from one issue to another and back again. Anyway, I'm no English major. I don't think in paragraphs and I find it difficult to write in paragraphs. So if any of you want to re-organize or re-word this post, feel free to do so. Whatever it takes to make people understand.

11/05/08
A new president will be taking office soon. Backed up by a heavily democratic congress who have all campaigned on a promise to raise taxes on the rich. Unfortunately, this will be too little too late. Nowhere near enough to compensate for the incredible corruption of both major parties. Nowhere near enough to pay for the bailout. Nowhere near enough to stop that runaway train. There will be no change for the better. Obama's financial advisers are pigs. Warren Buffet is a pig. Oprah Winfrey is a pig. Obama himself is a multi-millionaire politician married to a multi-millionaire attorney. He has already run the most expensive political campaign in history. Some of it squandered on a $400 lobster feast for his wife. Financed for the mostpart by ordinary people who can't even afford a $400 lobster feast. It happened on Obama's watch. Probably more than once. He even had the nerve to ask those ordinary people to help pay off the campaign debt of another filthy rich multi-millionaire politician PIG (Hilary Clinton). I will admit that Barack Obama seems to have more character than most of his colleagues. Certainly more than Clinton, Gore, McCain, Palin, Bush, Cheney, Romney, Schwarznenager, Palosi, Kerry, Guliani, Kennedy, Bloomberg, or Edwards. He was probably a very good down to earth man at one time. The same goes for Joe Biden. Not anymore. Afterall, John McCain was also a very good down to earth man at one time. A true American hero. NOT ANYMORE. Now, he is a filthy rich politician pig married to a filthy rich big business pig. SOLD OUT. Mark my words: Obama and Biden will do the same. Whatever moral character they may have left, will be lost or heavily compromised while in office. Like the others, their administration will be riddled with scandals of greed and corruption. Like the others, they will succumb to the greatest epidemic ever faced by modern man. By far, the most intoxicating element of modern society. Greed. Simply the desire to get as rich as possible. It has the potential to blacken any heart. Break the will of any human being. Influense any government. Corrupt any society. Those who succumb to it are lost forever. You can not get through to these people. You can not make them understand. No matter how bad it gets for the little guy. No matter how many families loose their homes. No matter how many people go cold and hungry. No matter how many innocent children starve and die. No matter how much blood is shed. NO MATTER WHAT HAPPENS. The rich will ALWAYS blame the other guy. They will ALWAYS say or do whatever it takes to secure their own extreme personal wealth. When they 'give back', its only because they expect more in return. They will NEVER compromise their own bottom line. They will NEVER jeapordize their position in the 1% club. They will NEVER stand for a more reasonable distribution of wealth and resources. They will NEVER acknowledge greed as a form of evil. They will NEVER acknolwedge the potential it has to ruin EVERYTHING. They will NEVER admit the simple truth. GREED KILLS. IT WILL BE OUR DOWNFALL.

Ford, GM, and Dodge are begging the current admistration for some type of 'bridge loan' in order to avoid bankruptcy. The unions are begging for it. The people are divided. All because of a LIE. Again, we have been mislead. I'm not disputing their need. Its legit. I'm disputing the underlying cause. Competition my ass. China my ass. Japan my ass. Those factors are real but not fatal. They are also concequential. Not primary. Again, its GREED and CORRUPTION. Not only that of the auto executives and celebrities who demand millions to endorse the product (Toby Keith, Tiger Woods) but also within the health care industry. Thats right. Health care. The average doctor is a millionaire several times over. The average health care executive many times over. Both on average, are members of the 1% club. AGAIN, ITS THEIR FAULT. If it weren't for the OBSCENE health care charges, brainwash plots, and artificially inflated market, then the financial burden placed on Ford, GM, and Dodge wouldn't be anywhere near as high. They could easily match the labor of Honda, Toyota, and Hyndai who's workers are younger on average, more liberal, and not so demanding when it comes to 'health care'. In this case, the little guy is partly to blame for their incredible ignorance. They smoke, drink, get fat, fall for the most OBVIOUS health care scams, live by drug and doctor, kiss greedy doctor ass, drive up the cost of their own health care, demand full coverage, and then strike if they don't get it. Retired US auto workers on average are now causing their former employers to incur several hundred thousand dollars PER RETIREE in health care expenses over the span of their retirement. Those in the current workforce are partly to blame as well. Not for greed. Their wages are reasonable. But their health care demands are well in excess. If they would simply open their eyes, acknowledge the incredible greed and corruption within the health care industry, get off the couch, get off the pharmaceuticals, and take care of their own bodies, then their own cost of living would be lower, their health would be better, the market for their product would be higher, and the financial burden placed on Ford, GM, and Dodge would be MUCH lower. I'm not discounting other factors like gas prices, competition, and the US product line. But greed and ignorance wreak havok like no other elements of our society. They cause or allow the cost of living to rise and the middle class to shrink along with the potential market for every major industry. In this case, they also raise the financial burden placed on US auto makers. Mark my words: One or two of the big three US automakers will go bankrupt. They will do so regardless of any 'bridge loan'. Other well known foreign auto makers will follow. The entire manufacturing industry will become a shell of its former self. Millions of retirees will be cut off entirely. ALL BECAUSE OF GREED, CORRUPTION, AND IGNORANCE. The ripple effect is profound. IT WILL BE OUR DOWNFALL.

12/16/08
The feds have reduced their interest rate to an all time low. IT WON'T WORK. The same goes for any potential bailout for the US auto industry or any other. IT WON'T WORK. IT ABSOLUTELY POSITIVELY WILL NOT WORK. I would bet my life on it a hundred times over. Again, our own leaders refuse to acknowledge the single greatest drag on our economy. The single greatest underlying cause for the global economic crisis. GREED. They all refuse to acknowledge the downside. That idiot pig Arthur Laffer refuses to acknowledge it. Greenspan, Bernanke, and Paulson refuse to acknowledge it. Bush, Clinton, Kerry, Gore, Obama, and Kennedy refuse to acknowledge it. Lars Larson, Tammy Bruce, Lou Dobbs, Mike Gallagher, Suze Orman, Bill O'Reiley, Maria Bartiromo, Jim Kramer, Rush Limbaugh, and Jim Bohannon refuse to acknowledge it. Bill Gates, Warren Buffet, Oprah Winfrey, Richard Branson, and T-Boone Pickens refuse to acknowledge it. The same goes for all of their filthy-rich billionaire friends. All of the above are hypocrite pigs who don't have the guts to admit the simple truth. This is not brain surgery. For the mostpart, its simple math. WE ARE IN THIS MESS BECAUSE OF GREED. The world's richest one percent are now so incredibly rich that there simply isn't enough wealth circulating beneath them to sustain the global economy. Its on the brink of collapse. IT WILL COLLAPSE. We are now entering what will go down in history as the worst economic and cultural crisis of all time by far. You think its bad now? YOU AIN'T SEEN NOTHING YET. NOTHING. Trillions more in wealth/capital will be concentrated (Not lost. Concentrated.). Many more banks large and small will fail. Tens of millions will loose their savings (Transfered from poor to rich.). Even FDIC accounts will be forfeited (Yes they will. Yes they will. Yes they will.). Every major industry will become a shell of its former self. Unemployment will reach unprecidented levels. Millions of retirees will be cut off entirely. The lower class will become dominant. The financial aid system will fail miserably. The vast majority of those in need will have no access. Crime, poverty, and suicide will skyrocket. There will be riots and random acts of violence at banks, hospitals, and government buildings. The next generation will be left to fight in the crumbling streets over a shattered American dream. The rest of the world will have it even worse. So don't blame innocent people from other countries you idiots. Blame the rich. Blame the government. Blame the health care industry. Then blame yourselves for being so stupid for so many years. We have allowed a particular form of evil to grow out of control, intoxicate our society, consume our government, wreak havok on our own economy and culture, RUIN any chance we ever had at world prosperity, and jeapordize the very foundation of modern society. At the same time, we have allowed those who epitomize it to get away with calling themselves 'heroes' or 'humanitarians'. Putting a happy face on greed and dumbing down our society further in the process. THAT MEANS YOU. So wake up fellow citizens. Grow a spine. Don't fall for all of this 'good will' 'humanitarian' BS from the rich. IT IS A SHAM. NOTHING BUT TAX DEDUCTIBLE PR CRAP. Instead, look at the bottom line. IT'S F#@&#%$ OBSCENE. NOW GET IT THROUGH YOUR THICK SKULLS YOU IDIOTS. WE ARE IN THIS MESS BECAUSE OF GREED. AMERICA'S RICHEST ONE PERCENT NOW OWN ALMOST 1/2 OF ALL UNITED STATES WEALTH. THE WORLD'S RICHEST ONE PERCENT NOW OWN OVER 40% OF ALL WORLD WEALTH. THATS WAY TOO MUCH. THESE PEOPLE ARE NOT HEROES. THEY ARE NOT HUMANITARIANS. THEY ARE DISGUSTING HYPOCRITE SLOBS. IT DOES NOT MATTER HOW MUCH THEY GIVE BACK. THEY STILL KEEP WAY TOO MUCH. IT CAN'T WORK THIS WAY. IT ABSOLUTELY POSITIVELY CAN NOT WORK THIS WAY. IT NEVER HAS AND IT NEVER WILL. GREED KILLS. IT WILL BE OUR DOWNFALL.

1% CLUB PIGS: I've said it many times and I will say it many more. Greed is not the desire to break the law or intentionally oppress another human being. Greed is simply the desire to take more than your reasonable share of wealth or any limited resource. By doing so, you reduce the value of currency and raise the cost of living worldwide. You shrink the middle class and the potential market for every major industry. You expand the lower class and the need for financial aid. You cause a domino-effect of socio-economic problems. You literally cause innocent people to suffer and die. YOU MAKE WORLD PROSPERITY MATHEMATICALLY AND PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE. It does not matter how much you 'give back'. It matters how much you KEEP. This is why I will go to my grave with nothing but bleeding and burning hatred for all of you. Thats right. I hate you and I'm not afraid to admit it. Afterall, its OK to hate a rapist. Its OK to hate a terrorist. I do. But I also hate wolves in sheep's clothing. THAT MEANS YOU. In fact, I consider the equation you stand for to be the greatest injustice of all time. It makes my f$#@&$# blood boil. Jealosy my ass. Low self-esteem my ass. Self-pity my ass. Anyone who still thinks that after reading all of this is a F&#@%$# MORON. You disgusting hypocrite pigs. I've noticed the little shots you've been taking at me, a few others, and the cause we stand for. The psychological stunts. Thats right Will Smith, Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt, Today Show pigs, Regis and Kelly, Ellen DeGeneres, Dr Phil, Oprah Winfrey, Elizabeth Hasslebeck, Melissa Scott, Joyce Meyer, Lars Larson, Bill O'Reiley, Lou Dobbs, Ann Coulter, Tammy Bruce, Laura Ingraham, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Jerry Doyle. I've noticed the crafty elusive statements you've been making about greed and subtle insults directed at those very few of us who stand against it. I also know that you're well aware of this campaign and that you're trying to shut it down. Of course, trying to do so in a manner that won't draw anymore attention to it. You've even gone out of your way to specifically attack 'anonymous' bloggers in general. As if we are somehow less credible without a registered account. I'm not the slightest bit intimidated by any of it. YOUR TRICKS WILL NEVER WORK ON ME. Mark my words: No matter what you say or do, I will spend the rest of my life persecuting all of you for the disgusting, obscene, unjust, illogical, and immoral equation you stand for. I won't break any laws. I won't harm one hair on your rotten heads. Its not that I don't wish you were gone. I do. But I would never jeapordize such an important cause with a criminal act. NEVER. My only realistic goal is to make as many people as possible understand. Including future generations. I hope they look back on these words and spit on your graves. Afterall, they won't achieve any degree of world peace or prosperity until after they acknowledge GREED as a form of EVIL. Not until they acknowledge it with a number or some type of material standard. In the unlikely event they ever do, I hope they FINALLY come up with a system that works for the vast majority. One with a reasonable pay scale and caps on personal wealth. Otherwise, their system will fail over and over again. Just like the one you stand for. It can't work this way. It never has and it never will. NEVER. NO WAY IN HELL. So mark my words: I will not make excuses for a single one of you. I don't care how smart you think you are. I don't care how talented you think you are. I don't care how pretty you think you are. I don't care how noble you think you are. I don't care what you think you've done to earn up to fifty thousand times the pay of a firefighter, soldier, farmer, teacher, cop, aid worker, cook, paramedic, truck driver, or garbageman. You're not worth it. I don't even care if your personal fortune fell out of the sky. If you're rich, I hate you. I don't care how much you 'give back'. I care how much you keep. Therefore, I will do everything within my power and within the law to expose your incredible greed and hypocrisy. If you want to break my will, then you're going to have to break my neck first. and if you pull a stunt like that, then a lot of people will know what happened to me and why. I've planned in detail for it. Most of you have no idea. Regardless, you pigs will not go down in history as 'heroes' or 'humanitarians'. Not if I can help it. We're in this mess primarily because of you. Its going to get MUCH worse primarily because of you. Thats what I believe and thats the message I intend to spread for the rest of my life. DEAL WITH IT.

1.21.09
A few more words about our new president and how certain public figures are using him to divert our attention, dumb down our society, shut my big mouth, and discredit the cause I stand for. I said it during the presidential campaign, I said it again in November, and I will say it again now. Our new president has more character than most of his colleagues. Much more. In fact, he puts Bush, Cheney, Rice, Clinton, Gore, Palosi, Reagan, Carter, Romney, Schwarzenegger, Bloomberg, and Kennedy to shame. He also puts nearly every living public figure to shame. Including those who claim to support him. By politician, public figure, and 1% club standards, he is an angel. That being said, he is still a politician. Still a public figure. Still a member of the one percent club. Just a man. Like any other, he is a product not only of genetics but also of his environment. Like any other, he is intoxicated by certain elements of modern society. Including three of the worst. Fame, fortune, and power. All three have the potential to corrupt the mind, the heart, and the will of any human being. I can name only one who resisted the influense of all three. Mother Teresa died in 1998. The amazing standard she set died with her. Since then, an army of public figures and false heroes have sold out the very concept of 'good will'. Capitalizing on bogus promises to make the world a better place. The vast majority, on day one. The rest, along the way. Obama will do the same. Its just pathetic human nature. Put any man or woman on a stage or throne and something about them is different. Make any man or woman rich and something about them is different. I said it in November and I will say it again. Barack Obama was probably a very good down to earth man at one time. That was before the corrupt influense of fame, fortune, and power. Now, something about him is different. The same goes for Michelle Obama. They have already begun to sell out. Not only as necessary during the campaign because of our ignorant society and the fact that we won't elect ANYONE unless they look a certain way, dress a certain way, talk a certain way, kiss our babies, cut our taxes, tell us what we want to hear no matter how unrealistic, believe in God, follow a certain religion, support a certain industry, and show up on our favorite talk show with a fake smile, stupid jokes, and lame dance moves. That was bad enough. A sell-out necessary to get elected by a pathetic, ignorant, naive, short sighted, half-wit, couch potatoe, love-sick, celebrity junkie society. But also for profit before, during, and after the election. I already mentioned the $400 lunchtime lobster feast. Paid for mostly by ordinary people who were willing to cut into their modest bottom lines in order to help get their hero elected. SHE ATE IT. That was bad enough. Another sign of the times. As expected, its already getting worse. I have no problem with the armor plated presidential limo, the extra security, the inauguration, or the speech. I have no problem with the concept of a public celebration. But I do have a problem with the $35,000 ring, the $150,000 dress, the exotic crystal, the exotic food, the coorporate plugs, NBC, MTV, BET, Beyonce, LL Cool J, Miley Cyrus, and every other filthy rich big business/big money/big celebrity hypocrite pig who had the nerve to fly in on their personal jets, stand there lavished in gold, and jewels, and fur, and $10,000 suits and pretend as if they and Obama share a desire to make the country and our world a better, more stable, more peaceful, and more 'just' place for all its people. Once again, promoting their own interests, dumbing down our society, and dancing their way around the single greatest underlying cause for the global economic crisis. GREED. The single greatest threat to modern society. GREED. Filthy, rotten, disgusting, self-centered, self-serving, black-hearted, hypocritical GREED. By doing so, they divert our attention AGAIN at a crucial time when we need more than ever to finally acknowledge GREED as a form of EVIL. At a time when we need more than ever to understand how it burns through moral character, spreads like wildfire, jumps from one industry to another, one person to another, and wreaks havok on society worldwide. IT ABSOLUTELY POSITIVELY BEYOND ANY SHADOW OF A DOUBT WILL BE OUR DOWNFALL. All of this happened on Obama's watch. I understand that he didn't plan most of the details. But he did know about many. He stood by and watched that event sell out to the highest bidder. He also bought the ring. He didn't even have a word to say about the double standards or many ethical contradictions. Afterall, he got elected. It was no longer necessary to kiss so much big business, big money, big celebrity, 1% club ass. SELL-OUT. Now, that army of filthy-rich, self-centered, self-serving, self-promoting, hypocrite pigs are using Obama's hopefull words against those very few of us who know better. They even have the nerve to belittle and villianize people like me simply because we don't float around with happy uplifting thoughts and a smile on our face. They pretend as if our message can't possibly be legitimate if its expressed with anger, contempt, hatred, or fear. As if a 'positive' attitude is any match for that domino-effect of socio-economic problems caused almost entirely by GREED. I understand that Obama could never go on record with views anything like mine. He has no choice but to be tolerant of other filthy-rich and powerful public figures. I can even forgive the affiliation to some extent. I also believe that he truly does want some degree of government reform, ethics, accountability, peace, prosperity, stability, opportunity, and economic justice for all people. Like I said, by politician standards he is an angel. Which is probably the nicest thing I will ever say or even think about a rich and powerful public figure. I find it near impossible to hate the man. He is literally the only rich and powerful public figure on this planet that I don't hate. I also understand why he gave the uplifting speech. I really don't blame him for a single word of it. But I will not pretend as if a smile or 'positive' attitude is any match for that particular form of evil consuming our world. I will not choose 'hope' over 'fear' just because it feels nice. Of course, I want things to get better. Of course, I will try in vain to help make things better. Of course, I want something legitimate to celebrate. Something that we could all be a part of. Of course, I desperately want Obama to succeed. Of course, I desperately want all of my predictions to be proven wrong. I just don't see it happening. With or without Obama, we are still stuck on that runaway train. Its not going to be any better. Its not going to be alright. Not for the vast majority. Its going to get much worse and stay that way for a very long time. I fully expect to die knowing that I devoted myself to a cause which was lost from day one. Greed will always triumph over good will. The people will never take any real stand against it. The vast majority are pathetic, ignorant, naive, short sighted, brainwashed, pharmameutical, medical-testing, couch potatoe, credit card, love-sick, celebrity junkie, powderpuffs. Perfect little victims. I hate to say that about my fellow citizens but its the truth. Afterall, they didn't see this comming. I tried to warn them and they still didn't see it. Others tried to warn them and they didn't see it. Albert Einstein tried to warn them SIXTY F$#&#$# YEARS AGO. They didn't listen. They didn't see it. They did NOTHING to stop this or even slow it down. Even now, when the problem is so much more obvious. Even now, when the futures of their children are at stake. Still, they do NOTHING. Sometimes, I wonder if they are even worth fighting for. What the hell is the point? They will never listen. They will never wake up. They will never do simple math. They will never take a stand. There will never be economic justice. There will never be a more reasonable distribution of wealth and resources. Therefore, there will never be any degree of world peace or prosperity. Its only going to get worse. A LOT WORSE. GREED KILLS. IT WILL BE OUR DOWNFALL.

The new stimulus won't work. The new money won't work. The new budget won't work. There may be a shallow revival later this year or next but it won't sustain itself. It absolutely positively will not work. Obama's efforts are revolutionary but they are too little too late. The opposition too strong. Which by the way, is not about national debt. Thats a lie. Nobody cares. Its about inflation. The rich are throwing a fit over government spending because when more money is printed, their money looses some value. They have some damn nerve. They already have too much money. Leaving the majority with too little. They won't give it up. They won't tolerate higher taxes. The equation they stand for absolutely can not work. Still, they have the nerve to throw a bloody fit over government spending unless its their own budget with their own pork, their own diversion of funds, their own tax breaks, and their own kick backs. Hundreds of billions worth. In which case, they are all for it. Afterall, inflation is fine with all of them as long as they end up with a net gain in buying power. Otherwise, they throw a bloody fit. This is why Democrats and Republicans always fight tooth and nail over government spending. Its not about 'patriotism'. Its not about 'fiscal responsibility'. Its not about the 'middle class'. Its not about the 'next generation'. Its about their own incredible greed. Of course the majority were better off under Clinton. They were also better off under Reagan. Even with a lower GDP, they will still better off. Only because that massive transfer of wealth from poor to rich was still in the early to mid stages. It began in the late seventies. It was accelerated under Reagan and again under Bush. Now, we have finally reached a tipping point. The majority can no longer afford to pay all of their bills and sustain their share of the economy. In fact, they are in debt to the tune of almost $2,000,000,000,000. THATS ALMOST TWO TRILLION DOLLARS. Obama's efforts are about re-distributing some wealth. He is one of the very few politicians to care about the majority almost as much as his own bottom line. Which is about the best we can hope for from any politician. Unfortunately, the rich won't give up anything. Even those who claim to support him won't give it up under any circumstances. This leaves Obama with no choice but to print trillions in US currency, water down all existing US wealth, raise taxes slightly on the rich, and tweak the budget slightly in favor of the majority. Hopefully, resulting in a gradual transfer of wealth from rich back to poor. Its a revolutionary effort. Very noble. Unfortunately, it won't be enough to stop that runaway train. The rich are too greedy. The opposition too strong. The government too corrupt. Obama himself will sell out before its all said and done. Mark my words he will sell out to the rich. That vital transfer of wealth from rich back to poor will not take place. Therefore, Obama will have no choice but to acknowledge a severe US depression by the end of his first term or shortly thereafter. There will be no economic recovery without a more reasonable distribution of bottom line wealth. The richest one percent must be willing to settle for less. A lot less. Otherwise, there will be no economic recovery ever. Not one of us will live to see it.

3.04.09
We are being fed a constant line of BS from the media about 'lost' market wealth. Similar to the line of BS we have been fed for years about wealth 'creation'. NBC and their panel of paid 'experts' (liars) recently took a question from a viewer (it may have been staged) about market 'losses' and 'gains'. Their answer was downright vague and misleading as usual. Stock values don't simply represent our collective 'productivity' or 'hard work'. Otherwise, Ford, GM, and Dodge would be doing fine. Afterall, the cars got built. If their answer had been true, then we could all just work a little harder, produce a little more, buy a little more, and revive our own economy. We can't. Its not that simple. Their answer was CRAP. Another stunt to make it appear as if we're all in this together. That panel of paid 'experts' (liars), also refered to stock values as 'phantom' wealth. Thats not exactly true either. Otherwise, those shares could never be traded for any actual product or service (They are. They always have been.). They also wouldn't give the majority share holders such authority. So what did NBC and their filthy rich trio of paid 'experts' (liars) leave out? The ugly truth as usual. Corporate stock values are not 'phantom'. They actually represent past profit margins, current profit margins, accounting scams, bailouts, and the potential transfer of more dollars FROM US TO THEM. The only 'phantom' elements involved are the shady speculation and accounting scams. Which do effect those values but they still result in a transfer of dollars from one party to another. Otherwise, those fluctuating values are based on real world events. In the meantime, they are traded like an alternative form of currency. Eventually cashed in for market value. Just like gold and silver. Like any other form of currency, the richest one percent hold the lion's share. They currently own about 1/2 of the entire US market. The upper class own around 1/3. Foreign investors own around 1/8. The lower 90% of us own the scraps leftover. This equation has contributed to a constant transfer of wealth from poor to rich. Its been accelerating for decades along with obscene, record setting profit margins for big business. These record setting profit margins were mathematically impossible to sustain with a shrinking middle class. The housing and stock markets were impossible to stabilize long term. They were on a crash course with or without sub-prime. Which is why in part, the rampant speculation and accounting scams took place. Also why the 'mark to market' rule was changed. Which basically allowed traders to take their profits and disregard the potential liabilities that inevitably came with a concentration of wealth and capital worldwide. These were all stunts whipped up by the 1% club to artificially inflate and sustain the market at a time when the very foundation of our economy was crumbling. To sell out their own industries and convert capital into dividends, bonus checks, and golden parachutes. Now, the cat is out of the bag. The market has finally crashed. Those artificially inflated stock values have fallen on average by about 50% in the past two years. They are down worldwide. Which may lead one to believe that America's richest 1% are finally taking a loss. They are not. Those values are down not only because they were artificially inflated. But primarily because so many people are finally running out of money to give them. This is the single greatest underlying cause for the global economic crisis. Unfortunately no public figure has the guts to acknowledge it. When the filthy rich pigs (Bill Clinton, Jean Chatzky, Bill O'Reiley, Jim Kramer, Suze Orman, Maria Bartiromo, Lars Larson, Lou Dobbs, Warren Buffet, ect) talk about 'lost' market wealth, they fail to acknowledge that much of that wealth wasn't 'lost' at all. It was transfered to various members of the 1% club. These transfers took place before, during, and after the height of the market in 2007. In many cases, 'junk bonds', 'toxic debt', or 'artificial values' were left in their place. Otherwise, those pigs are primarily refering to lost 'business'. A slower transfer of wealth. There is a HUGE difference. Actual wealth doesn't just float away. Stock values fluctuate but they still represent a transfer of actual wealth from one party to another. Unfortunately, that transfer of wealth has been in favor of the rich for too many years. THEIR CURRENT PROFITS ARE DOWN ON AVERAGE BECAUSE THEY HAVE BEEN TOO OBSCENE FOR TOO LONG. THEY ALREADY OWN THE LION'S SHARE OF UNITED STATES WEALTH. A SIMILAR RULE APPLIES WORLDWIDE. MARKETS ARE DOWN BECAUSE THE WORLD'S WEALTH AND CAPITAL HAVE BEEN CONCENTRATED. AMERICA'S RICHEST 1 PERCENT NOW OWN ALMOST 1/2 OF ALL UNITED STATES WEALTH. THAT IS MUCH MORE THAN THE ENTIRE MIDDLE AND LOWER CLASSES COMBINED. THE WORLD'S RICHEST ONE PERCENT NOW OWN OVER 40% OF ALL WORLD WEALTH. THAT IS MUCH MORE THAN THE LOWER 90% WORLDWIDE. PROFITS FOR THE RICHEST 1% ARE DOWN ON AVERAGE BUT NOT GONE. THEY STILL GET EVEN RICHER AS WE SPEAK. THEIR INCREDIBLE WEALTH WAS NOT CREATED, GENERATED, OR GROWN IN THEIR BACK YARD. IT WAS TRANSFERED FROM US TO THEM. NOT ONLY THROUGH CORPORATE PROFITS BUT ALSO THROUGH INDIVIDUAL PROFITS. THE WORLD'S WEALTHIEST 1 PERCENT ARE NOW SO INCREDIBLY RICH, THAT THERE SIMPLY ISN'T ENOUGH CURRENCY CIRCULATING BENEATH THEM TO SUSTAIN THE GLOBAL ECONOMY. ITS FINALLY ON THE BRINK OF COLLAPSE. ANYONE IN THE FIELD OF ECONOMICS WHO STILL WON'T ACKNOWLEDGE THE SINGLE GREATEST UNDERLYING CAUSE FOR THIS GLOBAL ECONOMIC CRISIS IS EITHER A MORON OR A COWARD. ITS NOT BRAIN SURGERY. FOR THE MOSTPART, ITS SIMPLE MATH. THE RICH ALREADY OWN TOO MUCH OF EVERYTHING. STILL, THEY WANT MORE. THEY ABSOLUTELY WILL NOT LET GO OF THEIR INCREDIBLE GREED. THEY ARE USING EVERY ILLEGAL AND IMMORAL TRICK IN THE BOOK TO AVOID TAKING THEIR LOSSES. THEY DO SO WITHOUT THE SLIGHTEST REGARD FOR ANYTHING OR ANYONE BUT THEMSELVES. IT CAN'T WORK THIS WAY. IT ABSOLUTELY POSITIVELY CAN NOT WORK THIS WAY. IT NEVER HAS AND IT NEVER WILL. ALBERT EINSTEIN TRIED TO MAKE PEOPLE UNDERSTAND. GREED KILLS. IT WILL BE OUR DOWNFALL.

Another word about wealth 'creation'. That term is horribly over-used. 90% of the time, it is a LIE. Nothing but smoke and mirrors. Actual wealth can't be 'created' without harvesting a new resource or making more efficient use of one. Even then, there is usually a lagging downside caused or aggravated by a further concentration. A gain here. A loss there. For example: If you develop or renovate one area, then some material wealth is 'created' on site. Local property values increase giving the illusion of a much greater or widespread 'creation' of wealth. Those who invest, locate, and develop usually do so for maximum profit without regard for legitimate need. They almost always follow the trend and do so in newly developed or renovated areas. Drawing vital support away from others. Cities and states have been competing in a giant rat race for years. Fighting tooth and nail for these investments regardless of any legitimate need. Giving big business, developers, and investors huge tax breaks and incentives at the expense of ordinary people. Even going so far as to evict home owners under the rule of 'eminent domain', lease commercially zoned property for $1, or subsidize a giant portion of their investment on the backs of middle class tax payers. These deals are always cut behind closed doors under the guise of 'economic development'. Others have no choice but to do the same just to keep their own remaining business. Otherwise, those jobs, residents, and revenue are lost (relocated). Some, regardless. Of course, the entire system would be more stable and prosperous for the majority if we would simply maintain and renovate our industrial areas and develop others only as needed. But that wouldn't make developers, investors, and politicians filthy rich. So the rat race has been run not on need but greed. Resulting in a net loss for the little guy. One area is unnecessarily developed. Deals are cut. Investors, developers, and politicians get richer. The people get F$#&$&. Another area falls apart. Jobs and revenue are lost (relocated). Property values decrease. Followed by a lag in city services and a spike in gang activity or violent crime. Before you know it, another Wal-Mart, mall, factory, or housing development is built where it wasn't needed to begin with. Meanwhile, another area is deindustrialized and more innocent people can't find a local job or even take a walk in their own neglected communities without fear of being mugged, raped, beat up, or killed. This is only one general example. Others hailed to 'create' wealth also have their downsides. Simply because distribution, consumption, and sustainability are almost never taken into account. 'Wealth creation'. What a joke. 90% of the time, it is a lie motivated by greed. Otherwise, any wealth 'created' is gradually concentrated in the hands of the few as usual. Again, the potential benefit for the majority or society as a whole is horribly offset by the incredible greed of the rich. IT WILL BE OUR DOWNFALL.

3.11.09
The organized campaign to suppress the truth and divert our attention continues. Forbes has reported that many of the world's billionaires have lost bottom line wealth. They wen't out of their way to crunch all those numbers, draw their conclusions, and plaster them all over the media. Still no data for 2008 on the wealthiest one percent or the distribution of bottom line wealth worldwide. Why not? I'll tell you why not. Because they don't want us to make the connection. The current economic crisis was not caused by subprime, China, Japan, Mexico, the CRA, one bad policy, one administration, one major political party, or the other. These factors are only proximate at best. Not underlying. The current economic crisis was caused primarily by a massive transfer of wealth from poor to rich. In particular, the richest 1%. I realize there is some debate in the US over their share of her bottom line wealth. Some recent studies have shown it to be as little as 40%. Others near 50%. Nearly all recent studies have shown about 40% of the world's bottom line wealth to be held by the richest one percent. However, most studies to date have not included 'everything'. They refer only to one reported set of financial assets or another. They often take no stab at material assets or hidden assets. It is well known that various currencies, gold, silver, platinum, jewels, and other holdings are being hidden in secret accounts and vaults around the world. Well known but impossible to calculate. Also, when it comes to greed, fraud, oppression, corruption, or any other form of evil, history has shown time and time again that its almost always worse than first reported. The watered down results by then, are usually a year or two old. However, there is very little debate that wealth is being concentrated worldwide. Virtually every study shows it. The rate at which that wealth is concentrated has increased over the last decade or so along with record setting profits. It is incredibly obvious when you look around. For these reasons, I tend to believe the higher estimates. Regardless, it has become an epidemic worldwide. IT IS THE PROBLEM. Mark my words: Bottom line wealth may be fluctuating at the very top but its not comming back down to the majority where it belongs. When a billionaire looses a chunk of his or her net worth, it is almost always to other high ranking members of the 1% club. Not the majority. I would believe otherwise only with bankruptcy down, forclosure down, consumer debt down, unemployment down, home sales up, car sales up, middle class savings up, and a shrinking lower class. That would indicate a transfer of wealth from rich back to poor. Again, it can't be 'created'. It can't be 'stimulated'. It must be transfered from the rich and back to the majority. Otherwise, it won't work. That, unlike GDP, would indicate a healthy, stable, and sustainable US economy. On a global scale, it would be the single greatest step we could possibly take torwards world peace and prosperity. In which case, I would be thrilled to see my predictions proven wrong. I would gladly apologise for my rotten attitude. I would do so 'on-air' and 'online'. I would do my very best to apologise to every single critic. Including the filthy rich public figures I rip on. Its not going to happen. Wealth is still being transfered from poor to rich. Here in the US and also worldwide. Their stock values are down on average but their share of the world's bottom line wealth up on average. There is no doubt in my mind. There is also no doubt in my mind that the rich are converting and hiding assets around the world like never before. I don't claim to know half their tricks. But I do know they have many. They also have most of the world's leaders in their pocket. Almost all of whom will betray their own people on a whim and stop at nothing to get or remain as rich as possible. They absolutely will not let go of their incredible greed. IT WILL BE OUR DOWNFALL.

3.30.09
Every major economy in the world will be in depression by 2015.

1% CLUB PIGS: My right to remain anonymous is protected by federal law. If this right is violated, I will sue everyone involved and give 99% of the reward directly to my less fortunate fellow citizens. The rest, I will use to print up more copies of this document. DEAL WITH IT.

Posted by Anonymous to webdiary_libre at Apr 8, 2009 7:16:00 PM

Dear Google/Blogger person/system,

2009-03-25T09:11:00.006+01:00

[Updated, [2]]

The associated collection:

webdiary-libre.blogspot.com/
webdiary-crippled.blogspot.com/
webdiary-libre-8ed.blogspot.com/

is apparently not being correctly cached.

In particular, the cache of these two entries:

«This is Google's cache of http://webdiary-libre.blogspot.com/2009/03/google-problems.html. It is a snapshot of the page as it appeared on 12 Mar 2009 18:07:07 GMT.»

and

«This is Google's cache of http://webdiary-crippled.blogspot.com/2009/03/demon-zionists_06.html. It is a snapshot of the page as it appeared on 12 Mar 2009 18:19:07 GMT.»

are quite old and appear 'frozen.' In other cases, caching has been slow, and some cache entries have 'disappeared,' for varying periods.

I believe our troubles began with a malevolent comment, see below for full text[1].

If one searches for the last 12 words: "the Jew who was loaning you money on which to stay alive"

one gets a Google-comment in the right pane:

«Sponsored Links
Offensive Search Results
We're disturbed about these results
as well. Please read our note here.
www.google.com/explanation»

(The sponsor of the link would appear to be "Anti-Defamation League.")

You (the person reading this, any Google sub-system and/or the Google/Blogger system as a whole) - can presumably see why the searching of our blog has been partly inhibited - we have had no advice at all.

I personally am a truth-seeker, with a view to exposing lies and pointing out injustices. Naturally enough, one seeks to expose lies in a prioritised fashion - hence the -libre group's concentration on some specific fields. I - and my bloggging companions - believe that we are expressing valid opinions based on facts as and when we find them, and do not, neither by accident nor design, breach any legal or ethical rules, and in particular do not, as the below quoted comment accuses, indulge in racism of any shape or form.

It would be nice if you could restore full Google-ability to our blog.

Thanks in advance, IDHolm.

-=*=-

[1] On Mar 10, 2009 6:48:00 PM, Richard Tonkin said...

I know from discussions withmy father that there is a certain generation of people who believed the Leon Uris' "Trinity" version of events that have become completely disillusioned with the modern concept of Israel,in that actions that can be perceived to have any nobility have been perpetrated in order to protect this land.

On reflection,it's probably good that you folks have bastardised the Webdiary name. People can refer back the original and see that none of the rascist bile published on this website will appear in a place that respects every human as equal.

As a hoarder I keep,tucked away from view,the "Kike" stuff that was around in my grandfather's time. The stuff I've been reading here belongs in the same basket.

That this site bears the name Webdiary, as if in pretense of being a franchise of the Australian original, while presenting the unashamedly racsist (c'mon guys, read what you've written, and if you can't see it that's your problem) points of view herein suggest that you folk are a demographic subset of a long-dead generation who resented the Jew who was loaning you money on which to stay alive.

[Submitted to Google/Blogger via google/Request reconsideration]

[2] Update:

images from today:
reconsideration request

google-problems on 12 Mar

demon-zionists_06 on 12 Mar

Due to my gobsmacked state, I was a bit slow off the mark in collecting 'hard' evidence. See below 1st Google-warning triangle, flagged search a few days later (same result), and as of yesterday (changed, but still with the 'sponsored Link').

090311
warning trangle:

090313
1st warned search repeated two days later:

090324
2nd warned search

I'm looking through you, where did you go
I thought I knew you, what did I know
You don't look different, but you have changed
I'm looking through you, you're not the same

Your lips are moving, I cannot hear
Your voice is soothing, but the words aren't clear
You don't sound different, I've learned the game.
I'm looking through you, you're not the same

Why, tell me why, did you not treat me right?
Love has a nasty habit of disappearing overnight

You're thinking of me, the same old way
You were above me, but not today
The only difference is you're down there
I'm looking through you, and you're nowhere

Why, tell me why, did you not treat me right?
Love has a nasty habit of disappearing overnight

I'm looking through you, where did you go
I thought I knew you, what did I know
You don't look different, but you have changed
I'm looking through you, you're not the same

Yeah! Oh baby you changed!
Aah! I'm looking through you!
Yeah! I'm looking through you!
You changed, you changed, you changed!

google indexing ...

2009-03-22T18:31:00.005+01:00

.. of the _libre group ...

.. appears to be eff'n crippled

[update, [1] 090323]

[1] 090323: It goes from bad to worse. Last night, I did a lot of fiddling, to try (yet again!) to g00se the g00gle-b0t, including submitting a revised sitemap. This morning, things looked really good, with -crippled showing "Results 1 - 8 of 8 English and German pages from webdiary-crippled." Then I started to look at the cached entries - Oh, s**t!!? On checking, the cached 'problem' -libre posts are unchanged. Worse, the newly recorded cachings of -crippled are just not there.

It seems to indicate that a) the g00gle-b0t does its work OK, but then b) some other g00gle-component comes along and *selectively* flushes the cache. How? Why? It definitely looks to me like some sort of censorship; the only real question is it 'human instigated' (i.e. over there), or some equally idiotic g00gle-programming?

So much for so-called 'free speech' - bah!.

=» The blog-indexes (home-pages) are being updated (yesterday/today):

cache of -crippled.blogspot.com/ on 16 Mar 2009 10:20:03 GMT.
cache of -crippled.blogspot.com/ on 22 Mar 2009 18:09:06 GMT.

cache of -libre.blogspot.com/ on 21 Mar 2009 01:40:25 GMT.
cache of -libre.blogspot.com/ on 23 Mar 2009 07:46:19 GMT.

=» The 'problem' caches are unchanged:

cache of -libre,demon-zionists.html on 8 Mar 2009 07:03:52 GMT.
cache of -libre,demon-zionists.html on 8 Mar 2009 07:03:52 GMT.

cache of -libre,google-problems.html on 12 Mar 2009 18:07:07 GMT.
cache of -libre,google-problems.html on 12 Mar 2009 18:07:07 GMT.

cache of -crippled,demon-zionists_06.html on 12 Mar 2009 18:19:07 GMT.
cache of -crippled,demon-zionists_06.html on 12 Mar 2009 18:19:07 GMT.

cache of -libre,well-look-what-cat-dragged-in.html on 21 Mar 2009 02:07:32 GMT.
cache of -libre,well-look-what-cat-dragged-in.html on 21 Mar 2009 02:07:32 GMT.

=» Listed on h-p as cached - but missing from cache:

-crippled,google-indexing.html (new; this post)
-crippled,censorship-andor-violence-is-resort-of.html
-crippled,well-look-what-cat-dragged-in_28.html

=» All of the -crippled posts' content is visible in the h-p cache, so that content must be OK.

The last cached comment on -libre,well-look-what-cat-dragged-in
- is dated Mar 7, 2009 10:27:00 PM.

The last cached comment on -crippled,demon-zionists_06
- is dated Mar 12, 2009 7:58:00 AM (includes RT's spit)

I've said it before: it's driving me mad.

censorship and/or violence is the resort of the ...

2009-03-16T08:37:00.008+01:00

  .. incompetent and/or intellectually infirm; unjust force ...

    .. may win some battle - but will always eventually lose the war

[critical update - attempt to g00se the g00gleb0t...]

-=*=-

[Updated, [2]]

-=*=-

I've said it before but I'm prepared to say it again and again: arguing with propagandists aka (lying!) trolls is not 'just' pointless but worse; by engaging such cretins, all one does is extend the opportunity for them to repeat or introduce ever more of their filthy lies.

As emphasis, I have 'dug up' something from a looong time ago[1].

Having said that, I also have to repeat two other things:

1. Here in _(not so)libre, everyone is truly free. (Unless it's someone doing something nasty, like RT wrote/did/is doing.)

2. To do one's best (yes, we try!) - one must do what one does best.

-=*end*=-

Ref(s):

[1] *Very* friendly words:

  «And 3) What the hell is a "21st Century seaside Sisyphus"? Or, should I ask?»

[2] This might interest some: The Myth of Sisyphus is a philosophical essay by Albert Camus. Q: How would you choose?

The Demon Zionists

2009-03-06T21:44:00.003+01:00

[copy]

History is written by the victors - or is it? The ancient history of the Jewish people seems to me to have a very important twist. As I have written, Jewish history tells us that when King David conquered Jebus and made it his capital Jerusalem, he conciliated with a cult from Mount Zion - and the question is, did he rule them or did they rule him? The latter seems more plausible to me if we are to consider the behaviour of the most powerful Jews in history - the Zionists. How many Australians understand what being a Zionist actually means - I had no idea until I researched their history provoked by the Nazi methods of new Israel in their demand for someone else's land - supposedly to regain their ancient glory? Or supremacy as their God commanded them? In my simple terms, I would say that the Zionists' actions are the counterpart of history's worst exponents of the policy of absolute brutality to achieve a certain goal and claim that "the end justifies the means". Fair dinkum. To follow this policy, history seems to record that the aggressor first tests the weakness of the first opposition before they exercise their intentions. That certainly looks like the case in Palestine. After my Naval service I gained employment by an Oil Company who sent me to Bahrein to learn a certain type of fractionation. I found the people very friendly and if there was to be any criticism, it would be that the education of the most ordinary citizens left a lot to be desired. They were peaceful in the extreme and happy with their society and especially with their religious beliefs. The latter seemed to be "live and let live". They were not terrorists - they were just cursed with land and resources that others demanded. We should not underestimate the ultimate disasters that the Zionist invasion of Arab territory must eventually cause. Well might we say that life began in Mesopotamia!
NE OUBLIE.
Posted by Ernest William at 9:44 PM

6 comments:

IDHolm said...
G'day Ern,
.. not too shabby. Looks like someone offers you 2.54cm, you take the whole 1.609km. Well done, and now a 2nd welcome - to blog ownership.
March 7, 2009 4:51 AM

IDHolm said...
G'day again.
.. since you mention "King David," I'm supposing you know about a pivotal event leading up to the arguably illegal 'establishment' of 'modern' Israel, namely the The King David Hotel bombing, which was carried out on 22 July 1946 and *murdered* 91 people and left 46 more injured. Why is this bloody criminal act so remarkable, why mention it now? Well, apart from the fact that the KD-bombing was one of, if not the actual first example of modern-day terrorism, in the background to a TV report on the recent Clinton-Net'nYahoo meeting was the motive "KD." Looked like pretty disgusting hubris to me.
March 7, 2009 5:29 AM

orana gelar said...
Welcome to the blogosphere, Ern G.
March 7, 2009 6:31 PM

Ernest William said...
G'day ID. Apparently I have made a faux pas? I have only the wish to occupy the 2.54 cms that I thought I was offered. I don't understand what is meant by "author" "blogger" or "blog ownership". I still don't understand what a blog is - it gave birth sometime while I was otherwise occupied - I think.Unfortunately I have more problems than I thought. Even my Wife is having trouble explaining the computer to me. I guess that I am just not computer literate because I have difficulty absorbing all of the ways of this forum - and there seems to be many. I have no doubt that "bloggers" understand and enjoy the extraordinary amount of available avenues? And I enjoy the ability to say what I think and would like to continue to do so. I am afraid that my Naval service and my years of shiftwork trained me with only the ability to think and reason. So with respect, I would like to continue just commenting and enjoining in debate if that is okay?
Cheers Ern G.
March 7, 2009 8:13 PM

Ernest William said...
G'day again ID. Yes I did know about the terrorist attack on the King David Hotel which was only part of the continuing "terrorist sabotage" that the Zionists used to intimidate the war-weary British and their mandate. As I understand it, when the Brits completed their mandate the Zionists immediately unilaterally declared that they were the State of Israel. I believe that only the Americans accepted them, and that doesn't surprise me. The reason that I indulged myself with some history of the Jews; Hebrews and Zionists et al was because I wondered where they got the idea that they were entitled to the Palestinian land. In my simple mind I thought they were claiming that, subsequent to the holocaust, the world owed them a living - preposterous. After research, I have satisfied myself that they have no such right and their abhorrent treatment by the Nazis has been an excuse for pity, even by the relatives of the victims. The victims have been immortalised far more than the 20 million Russians who perished. They are not the only people; class; religion or race in history that have been brutally treated and their actions in the Middle East only demonstrates that they are quite capable of the same crimes. I notice ID that many scholars and Churchmen are now putting their credibility on the line to challenge the holocaust, not that it didn't happen, but that there were more than the Jews who suffered in the same way and in the same time and for the same reason. I believe that. The irony is that the Zionist cult and its message from their God, demands that they completely wipe out certain races - even their animals. I find their attitude an insult to the modern world and their treatment of the Arabs a crime against humanity. I would like to have more to say on this subject in the future.
Cheers Ern G.
March 7, 2009 8:42 PM

Ernest William said...
http://informationclearinghouse.info/article22108.htm
"As The Arabs See The Jews".
By His Majesty King Abdullah printed in the American Magazine November 1947. This is an amazing prediction of the future actions of the Zionists but was ignored by the powers that be. It is a lengthy article but well worth a read. I quote just the first paras of this brilliant man: "I am especially delighted to address an American audience, for the tragic problem of Palestine will never be solved without American understanding, American sympathy, American support. So many billions of words have been writtn about Palestine - perhaps more than on any other subject in history - that I hesitate to add to them. Yet I am compelled to do so, for I am reluctantly convinced that the world in general, and America in particular, knows almost nothing of the true case for the Arabs. We Arabs follow, perhaps far more than you think, the press of America. We are frankly disturbed to find that for every word printed on the Arab side, a thousand are printed on the Zionist side. So America is the "pinnacle of freedom"?
NE OUBLIE.
March 7, 2009 9:09 PM

[headline article as originally published by Ernest William ]

well, look what the cat dragged in!

2009-02-28T08:44:00.003+01:00

[critical update - attempt to g00se the g00gleb0t...]

DNP:Fiona:Racist and abusive Keep it up

Submitted by Ernest William ... on February 28, 2009 - 6:44pm.

Eliot Ramsey: "In every Muslim country surveyed, overwhelming or near unanimous majorities expressed negative views toward Jews. The figure reached 99 percent in Jordan, 98 percent in Egypt and 94 percent in Pakistan. Twenty-eight percent of Jordanians and 22 percent of Egyptians volunteered that "Jews" were to blame for bad relations between Muslims and the West, although Jews were not mentioned in the question."

The survey, according to you, was done on the population of those countries. What makes you think that they are all Muslims?

And in any case - how surprising. Why would the Jews be unpopular in the Middle East when they have considered themselves as different since the beginning of their religion - or is that a race?For some unknown reason to me, new Israel classifies itself as "western" and is so considered by the Arab nations of the middle east.Bearing in mind that the history of the nomadic tribes of the Arabian Desert who evolved into the Jews of today, I find that fascinating.The east is east and the west is west and never the twain shall meet.Just one more point Eliot, if I was Jewish I would never want you to defend me.NE OUBLIE.

DNP is their code for 'Do no publish.' That censoring from Reynolds comes on top of this sort of s**t editorialising from Tonkin:

Fair dinkum Alan. in Gaza Media Statement
by Ernest William ... on February 26, 2009 - 9:52pm

...

Richard: Ernest, your work that hasn't been published has been considered by editors to be racist, abusive, or containing-despite requests- unsourced extracts. Implications that anything more sinister is afoot do little for your perceived credibility.

Ethics? What ethics? Credibility? Whose credibility?